2009
DOI: 10.1128/jb.01052-08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Genomic Island of an Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strain Enables the Metabolism of Fructooligosaccharides, Which Improves Intestinal Colonization

Abstract: Prebiotics such as fructooligosaccharides (FOS) are increasingly being used in some countries for improving human and animal health and as an alternative to antibiotic growth promoters in animals, with various degrees of success. It has been observed that FOS stimulate the proliferation of probiotic bacteria and, at the same time, decrease the population of bacteria associated with disease. This observation assumes that pathogenic bacteria do not metabolize FOS and, therefore, lose their competitive advantage … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…B. coagulans started gaining popularity as a probiotic in recent years due to its ability to form endospores, which are resistant to high heat (a common food processing treatment) and acidity of the stomach. As a result, the These results are consistent with previous studies that showed some pathogenic and commensal E. coli strains could metabolize FOS [36] [37] [38]. Interestingly, while there were no statistically significant differences in ΔOD 600 among the carbohydrate sources for ECN, the ΔOD 600 of non-probiotic E. coli ATCC 33876 was significantly lower in dextrose than in FOS or lactulose (p < 0.0001, Figure 1).…”
Section: Bacterial Growthsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…B. coagulans started gaining popularity as a probiotic in recent years due to its ability to form endospores, which are resistant to high heat (a common food processing treatment) and acidity of the stomach. As a result, the These results are consistent with previous studies that showed some pathogenic and commensal E. coli strains could metabolize FOS [36] [37] [38]. Interestingly, while there were no statistically significant differences in ΔOD 600 among the carbohydrate sources for ECN, the ΔOD 600 of non-probiotic E. coli ATCC 33876 was significantly lower in dextrose than in FOS or lactulose (p < 0.0001, Figure 1).…”
Section: Bacterial Growthsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Some other bacterial species are known to metabolize FOSs, including bifidobacteria and lactobacilli, present in the intestinal microflora, and oral streptococci (26,27). Transporters for FOSs include ABC transporters, PTS, and major facilitator superfamily proteins (7,28,29). Our data suggest that utilization of FOSs longer than GF2 by pneumococci is dependent on one of two ABC transporters encoded at the same genomic location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…We had already used this strategy to characterize the AGI-3 region that is involved in the virulence of an avian pathogenic E. coli strain and that confers the ability to grow on fructooligosaccharides (7,43). During this tRNA screening, we showed that genomic islands might potentially be present downstream of the tRNA genes argW, leuX, pheU, pheV, selC, serU, and thrW in several APEC strains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%