A genre analysis of research article ‘findings and discussion’ sections written by Indonesian undergraduate EFL students

Abstract

The quality of findings and discussion (FD) section in a research article is crucial to elucidate the results of a particular inquiry and to situate the significance of the results in the body of knowledge through publications in scientific journals. Previous academic genre analysis has generated several models to help novice writers develop the rhetorical moves of the FD sections across disciplines. However, the study on the quality of the rhetorical moves in the undergraduate EFL students’ research articles is still scarce. Hence, this study seeks to examine the manifestation of rhetorical moves in the findings and discussion sections written by Indonesian undergraduate EFL students. A total of 113 unpublished ELT research articles from a state educational university in Bandung was selected as the target corpus. AntMover 1.10 was employed as the analysis tool. The top-down approach was carried out to obtain the existing rhetorical structure using Ruiying and Allison’s (2003) framework as the guideline. The bottom-up approach was used to scrutinize the linguistic realizations of the rhetorical moves. The findings demonstrated that, in the move level, most of the students’ FD sections had manifested the four moves, i.e., providing background information, reporting results, summarizing results, and commenting on results. However, in the step level, a number of FD sections did not provide detailed information regarding the sequence of the findings presentation, the analysis procedure to obtain the findings, the explanation for the findings, and the highlight of the significance of the findings. The randomized rhetorical patterns were also dominant. It can downgrade the clarity and rigor of the FD sections. Despite that, the linguistic realizations of the moves, particularly the tense and sentence voice, mostly conformed to the norms. The findings may serve as a reference to develop the teaching materials of English for research publication purposes (ERPP).

The Rhetorical Moves of Abstracts Written by the Authors in the Field of Hard Sciences

“…The reason is that move analysis can capture the similarities and differences of rhetorical moves manifested in the research article abstracts from hard sciences written by academicians. This method analysis was also used in some previous study regarding rhetorical moves such as Darabad (2016), Hwang et al (2017), Suntara (2013), and Suherdi, Kurniawan and Lubis (2020). This method also allows the researchers to record move analysis and the linguistic features applied within the academician's abstracts.…”

A Move Analysis of Research Article Introduction Written by Indonesian Authors: The Case of Soft and Hard Sciences

“…The ability to write an eligible research article has been more definitive than ever in line with the growing increase of academic seminars, workshops, discussions, and publications. A positive rate of international publication in particular can have an impact on the writers' financial prosperity and academic reputation as well as the institution's international recognition and contribution Chang and Kuo (2011), Kanoksilapatham (2005), Suherdi, Kurniawan and Lubis (2020). Hence, academic investigations on the writing of research articles keep being the central agenda among researchers of English for academic purposes.…”

Developing an Understanding of The Sources of Some Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Academic Writing

“…Because they are enrolled in universities where English is the medium of instruction, those students are required to write in English. Writing in English is difficult for many non-native speakers of English because they need to learn the language as well as the academic conventions (Suherdi et al, 2020). In other words, international students often struggle while attempting to conform to the English academic writing conventions (Juliaty, 2019).…”