ACKNOWLEDGMENTSAt this moment of finishing a dissertation project, I feel really content with what I have accomplished. I remember all my goals illustrated in my personal statement in the application package. I planned to learn knowledge about how to conduct research; I wanted to know more about bilingual education, especially how to teach bilingual courses in Chinese higher education; I expected to know the complexity of educational administration and how to conduct studies of educational policies; I wanted to know the updated teaching methods of college English, assessment of language learning, what coherence was and why teaching vocabulary was so important; I also wanted to know how to develop EFL curricula and syllabi. Now, I have got what I wanted about educational research, administration, and language learning and teaching principles, or even more than I expected. Having achieved these goals, I hold, deep in my heart, the gratitude for the help that I have been given by the people around me.The major professor, Dr. Eric Dwyer, has been providing sufficient support for my dissertation project, being so patient and encouraging, reviewing the drafts again and again, linking my conceptual frameworks with paragraphs, sentences, phrases and graphics. During this process, the contrasting rhetorical preferences have been made so obvious that I like to present my ideas in sequential conceptualized frameworks while he linked these less coherent frameworks into a smooth flow of meaning. Dr. Benjamin Baez and his suggestion about the macro-structure of the dissertation refined the beginning chapter, especially his reminder to give equal attention to both Chinese and U.S. students' English writing since this was a comparative study. As a result, the research purpose of the study was elevated from focus on Chinese college students' iv English writing to college English intercultural rhetoric. Dr. Kyle Perkins reminded me of the importance to have hypotheses specified in the study since a dissertation is expected to include three types of knowledge: theoretical, procedural and empirical. Statements of hypotheses are part of procedure knowledge and it's necessary to have them included in the statistical testing procedures. He also guided me into the assessment horizon of writing, from which I got to know direct writing assessment, holistic writing assessment and analytical writing assessment. The last category, analytic assessment, is what my study was related to. From him, I also got to know that analytic assessment is good for giving feedback. Dr. Teresa Lucas's question about the relationship between concepts and theories informed me of the importance of illustrating how theories were formulated and their relationship with concepts. When I found the answer from the book about the foundations of grounded theory, I realized how essential the knowledge was for a doctoral student. Her reminding of mentioning how to do self-revision in the section of implications was also helpful to refine the composing of the dissertation...