2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A geographically weighted regression kriging approach for mapping soil organic carbon stock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
132
1
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
132
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Residuals are considered as errors, and it is possible that the errors have some spatial correlation structure that can be modeled. It could be considered that the errors are the component of the model which cannot be explained by the deterministic component, but is important to add as it helps explain the variation of the target variable across space [88]. GWRK has been proven to be an effective method for spatial prediction [88][89][90].…”
Section: The Downscaling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residuals are considered as errors, and it is possible that the errors have some spatial correlation structure that can be modeled. It could be considered that the errors are the component of the model which cannot be explained by the deterministic component, but is important to add as it helps explain the variation of the target variable across space [88]. GWRK has been proven to be an effective method for spatial prediction [88][89][90].…”
Section: The Downscaling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the MGWR is an extension of GWR and MLR, we conducted GWR and MLR to predict the SOM spatial distribution and compared the mapping results, accuracies and regression coefficients of GWR, MLR and MGWR. Besides, there are some other competitive methods in digital soil mapping, such as GWRK (GWR-kriging) (Kumar et al, 2012;Sun et al, 2015), LRK (local regression-kriging) (Sun et al, 2012;Sun et al, 2015), and KED (kriging with an external drift) (Song et al, 2016). We also compared the MGWR method with GWRK (GWRkriging), LRK (local regression-kriging), KED (kriging with an external drift), and OK (ordinary kriging).…”
Section: Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies show higher accuracy than feature space-only models, due to the inclusion of spatial autocorrelation of model residuals in the models (Brus and Heuvelink, 2007;Odeh and Mcbratney, 2000;Sumfleth and Duttmann, 2008;Sun et al, 2012). However, the model residuals can't always tally with the first order or second order stationarity and seldom of these methods can be adapted to fit data locally with varying coefficients over space for the regression (Kumar et al, 2012;Walter et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kriging is a geostatistical method that is commonly used to interpolate an SOCD data set from discrete points to a spatially continuous surface (Kumar et al, 2012;Khalil et al, 2013), and the semivariable function can be used to quantify the spatial autocorrelation and provides an input parameter for a spatial interpolation . All of the calculations for mapping SOC within individual soil depth ranges were performed using the ArcGIS software (Version 9.3).…”
Section: Estimation Of Soc Storagementioning
confidence: 99%