1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1985.tb01349.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A geomagnetic induction anomaly from IMS data near Hudson Bay, and its relation to crustal electrical conductivity in central North America

Abstract: Canadian geomagnetic data collected during the International Magnetospheric Study are used to investigate the terrestrial electrical conductivity structure of north-eastern Manitoba and part of the North-west Territories. The computed transfer functions resolve a major conductor trending east-west between the communities of Gillam and Back in Manitoba. Regional trends in the surface geology suggest that this conductor may be linked with the North American Central Plains electrical conductor. Twodimensional mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

1985
1985
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1). This anomaly, mostly in the deep crust, has been tracked from Wyoming through the Dakotas and Saskatchewan over to northern Manitoba (Alabi et al, 1975;Handa and Camfield, 1984;Gupta et al, 1985), and possibly has a counterpart in Scandinavia (Jones, 1993a). Camfield and Gough (1977), in an insightful paper, suggested that the conductivity anomaly is the geophysical marker for a Proterozoic collision zone from the southern Rockies to northern Canada-a proposal that conflicted with the then prevailing view that the Wyoming and Superior cratons were contiguous.…”
Section: Continental Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). This anomaly, mostly in the deep crust, has been tracked from Wyoming through the Dakotas and Saskatchewan over to northern Manitoba (Alabi et al, 1975;Handa and Camfield, 1984;Gupta et al, 1985), and possibly has a counterpart in Scandinavia (Jones, 1993a). Camfield and Gough (1977), in an insightful paper, suggested that the conductivity anomaly is the geophysical marker for a Proterozoic collision zone from the southern Rockies to northern Canada-a proposal that conflicted with the then prevailing view that the Wyoming and Superior cratons were contiguous.…”
Section: Continental Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from an International Magnetospheric Study (IMS) chain of magnetometers running north-south alongside Hudson's Bay in Manitoba were shown to exhibit a strong reversal in ,H,, between two stations; BCK (Back: 57.7°N) and GIM (Gillam: 56.4°N) (GUPTA et al, 1985). These data were modelled two-dimensionally as a 25 SZ.m body at a depth of 5 km, of weaklyresolved thickness extent but with a definite northward dip.…”
Section: Previous Em Studies In the Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GDS arrays and profiles that followed (Camfield et al 1970;Porath et al 1970Porath et al , 1971Gough and Camfield 1972;Alabi et al 1975;Handa and Camfield 1984;Gupta et al 1985) suggested that the NACP was morphologically linear and extended for some 2000 km, but that its origin was not fully known along its entire length. Later studies using the MT technique have shown that the anomaly is in the crust and has a geometry that can be spatially identified with specific domains of the internides of the THO.…”
Section: North American Central Plains Conductivity Anomalymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At greater depths, an angle of 40°is more appropriate. In the location of the MT profile, the THO rotates to the northeast towards Hudson Bay (Hoffman 1989), as does the NACP anomaly (Gupta et al 1985). An MT strike angle of 60°confirms the eastward rotation of the crustal structures, while a deeper angle of 40°does the same for deeper structures in the upper lithospheric mantle.…”
Section: Dimensionality and Distortion Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation