2002
DOI: 10.1093/auk/119.4.1179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Geometric Method for Determining Shape of Bird Eggs

Abstract: Precise quantification of the oval of a bird egg can provide a powerful tool for the analysis of egg shape for various biological problems. A new approach to the geometry of a bird egg oval is presented here using a simple algebraic equation to fit all normal bird egg shapes. Only two parameters are needed in the equation for complete shape description of an egg oval to quantify the equation's capacity for curve fitting all species and shapes of bird egg ovals. The equation was fitted to egg silhouettes from a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To extract shape descriptors of the FGF gradient, an isoline at 1/e of the maximal concentration was fit to the ovoid function [Baker, 2002], using the scipy.optimize.curve_fit function. The ovoid function offers a simple formula to approximate asymmetric elliptical shapes (similar to those observed experimentally), with the ellipticity T encoding the shape aspect ratio, and the asymmetry λ the reciprocal blunting of one end and sharpening of the opposing end of the shape.…”
Section: Baseline/physiologic Parameter Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To extract shape descriptors of the FGF gradient, an isoline at 1/e of the maximal concentration was fit to the ovoid function [Baker, 2002], using the scipy.optimize.curve_fit function. The ovoid function offers a simple formula to approximate asymmetric elliptical shapes (similar to those observed experimentally), with the ellipticity T encoding the shape aspect ratio, and the asymmetry λ the reciprocal blunting of one end and sharpening of the opposing end of the shape.…”
Section: Baseline/physiologic Parameter Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a starting point, one can embody structurally a certain engineering object in the shape of an egg through use of its respective mathematical model. Despite fairly extensive research in this field for ∼70 years (e.g., Preston, 1953 ; Carter, 1968 ; Todd and Smart, 1984 ; Smart, 1991 ; Baker, 2002 ; Troscianko, 2014 ; Biggins et al, 2018 ; Pike, 2019 ), the Narushin’s ( Narushin, 2001b ) and Hügelschäffer’s ( Petrović and Obradović, 2010 ; Petrović et al, 2011 ; Obradović et al, 2013 ) models have recently gained the most attention. While the former is thought to be more applicable in thin-walled shell structures ( Zhang et al, 2017a ; b , 2019 , 2021 , 2022 ), the latter has been more adapted to architectural and construction design ( Petrović et al, 2011 ; Maulana et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most often, this function was determined by directly measuring the tested eggs, after which the data was subjected to a mathematical processing using the least squares method. As a result, a function could be deduced that, unfortunately, would be adequate only to those eggs that were involved in an experiment ( Baker, 2002; Troscianko, 2014; Pike, 2019 ). Some authors ( Todd and Smart, 1984; Biggins et al, 2018 ) applied the circle equation instead of ellipse as the basic formula, but the principle of empirical determination of the function f ( x ) remained unchanged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%