2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11370-018-0254-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A geometrical path planning method for unmanned aerial vehicle in 2D/3D complex environment

Abstract: This paper presents a geometrical path planning method, and it can help unmanned aerial vehicle to find a collision-free path in two-dimensional and three-dimensional (2D and 3D) complex environment quickly. First, a list of tree is designed to describe obstacles, and it is used to query the obstacles which block the line from starting point to finishing point (blocking obstacle). Specially, the list also stores the edge information of blocking obstacle. For the obstacles with short distance, a reasonable way … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the path generators in the specialized literature, the A-Star algorithm is a well-known efficient alternative that deterministically finds sub-optimal feasible paths in complex scenarios [60]. A-Star operates over a grid discretization of the workspace that considers the cells containing obstacles or threats as prohibited regions.…”
Section: ) Enhanced Path-search Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the path generators in the specialized literature, the A-Star algorithm is a well-known efficient alternative that deterministically finds sub-optimal feasible paths in complex scenarios [60]. A-Star operates over a grid discretization of the workspace that considers the cells containing obstacles or threats as prohibited regions.…”
Section: ) Enhanced Path-search Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 4(a), Property I indicates that the subgoal S must be in the shortest path between P 2 and E. e role of the subgoal of P 2 is to drive and force E so that the situation is more beneficial to pursuers. When P 1 performs 3D interception, the subgoal of P 1 can be obtained according to our previous works [31,32]. Figure 4(b) shows the calculation of a 3D subgoal by taking a cuboid obstacle as an example.…”
Section: Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to formulas (9), (10), (13) and (14), Wmax, V, t, ρ and r were set to 0.013/s, 4 m/s, 10 s, 307.69 m and 3 m, respectively. Then, the boundaries of the reachable set RSxy, i.e.…”
Section: Reachable Set On 2d Planementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many reviews have been completed on relevant issues in the past two years [5][6][7][8]. Popular collision avoidance algorithms include geometric method [9][10][11], sampling-based method [12][13][14], numerical optimization [15][16][17][18][19], and artificial potential field (APF) [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. The geometric method considers the geometric representation of the collision scene in the search for collision avoidance maneuvers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%