2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A geotechnical stratigraphy for the shallow subsurface in the Southern Central Graben, North Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These sediments, which are found in the ‘Entenschnabel’ area, are of late Saalian (Coughlan et al . 2018) to pre‐Weichselian (Prins & Andresen 2021) age and correlate with the Upper Fluvial Member of the Saalian Fluvial Formation (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These sediments, which are found in the ‘Entenschnabel’ area, are of late Saalian (Coughlan et al . 2018) to pre‐Weichselian (Prins & Andresen 2021) age and correlate with the Upper Fluvial Member of the Saalian Fluvial Formation (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lithological characteristics, tip resistance, thickness and stratigraphic position of units above reworked morainic remnants of the Till Member of the Drenthe Formation are similar to those of the Upper Fluvial Member within the study area. Prins & Andresen (2021) identified the corresponding sediments as their ‘Unit 3’ in a study area close to the ‘Entenschnabel’ in the Danish North Sea sector using seismic and CPT data. These sediments, which are found in the ‘Entenschnabel’ area, are of late Saalian (Coughlan et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This allows more robust stratigraphic architecture interpretations away from data coverage, more accurate constraints on time-to-depth relationships, and helps to delimit the distribution and thickness of potentially weaker (or overconsolidated) clay-rich sedimentary facies, or graveland boulder-rich layers (Figure 7). Nonetheless, geoscientists can extract more stratigraphic and palaeoenvironmental information from geotechnical data, such as Cone Penetration Test (CPT) logs, combining seismic units and CPT facies to better characterise geotechnical stratigraphy (Prins and Andresen, 2021). This includes deriving substrate bulk density/unit weight and shear velocity, and undrained shear strength, and therefore the overconsolidation ratio due to palaeoenvironmental changes (e.g., loading by ice sheets), recorded in different stratigraphic levels.…”
Section: Integration Of Geophysical and Geotechnical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%