2003
DOI: 10.1300/j021v23n01_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Geriatrics Curriculum for First Year Medical Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from virtually all available sources supported the finding: student attitude measures, student evaluations, student focus groups, student written narratives, and site visit interviews and focus groups independent of program duration or structure. Publications from the programs reported that student attitude scores on measures such as the University of California at Los Angeles Geriatrics Attitude Survey, the Aging Semantic Differential, and internally developed measures improved over the course of the senior mentor experience, 4,13–15 although there were reservations expressed in several programs about the reliability and performance of some of the measures used to evaluate student attitude change, 16 and consequently, qualitative measures such as focus groups and student course evaluations became important as corroborating sources of data. A number of published reports from the SMPs included in the evaluation pointed to the confidence that program staff had in student and mentor focus groups for evaluating student attitudes 17–19 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data from virtually all available sources supported the finding: student attitude measures, student evaluations, student focus groups, student written narratives, and site visit interviews and focus groups independent of program duration or structure. Publications from the programs reported that student attitude scores on measures such as the University of California at Los Angeles Geriatrics Attitude Survey, the Aging Semantic Differential, and internally developed measures improved over the course of the senior mentor experience, 4,13–15 although there were reservations expressed in several programs about the reliability and performance of some of the measures used to evaluate student attitude change, 16 and consequently, qualitative measures such as focus groups and student course evaluations became important as corroborating sources of data. A number of published reports from the SMPs included in the evaluation pointed to the confidence that program staff had in student and mentor focus groups for evaluating student attitudes 17–19 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modest amount of SMP literature appeared by 2005 2–7 and revealed a variety of SMP models. Programs varied according to length of mentor‐student contact, extent of integration into the medical school curriculum, percentage of students participating, targeted objectives, and program names (e.g., Senior Partners, Senior Teacher Educator Partnership, Optimal Aging Program).…”
Section: Program Models In the National Evaluation Of Senior Mentormentioning
confidence: 99%