A gesture-controlled projection display for CT-guided interventions

Mewes, André; Saalfeld, Patrick; Riabikin, Oleksandr; Skalej, Martin; Hansen, Christian

doi:10.1007/s11548-015-1215-0

Cited by 35 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Also in the Operating Room, Mewes et al. [MSR*16] proposed a set of LMC‐tracked single‐hand gestures to manipulate 3D planning models as well as select 2D buttons or navigate trough 2D slices. Hettig et al.…”

Section: Survey Of the State Of The Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

The State of the Art of Spatial Interfaces for 3D Visualization

Besançon

Ynnerman²,

Keefe

et al. 2021

Computer Graphics Forum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We survey the state of the art of spatial interfaces for 3D visualization. Interaction techniques are crucial to data visualization processes and the visualization research community has been calling for more research on interaction for years. Yet, research papers focusing on interaction techniques, in particular for 3D visualization purposes, are not always published in visualization venues, sometimes making it challenging to synthesize the latest interaction and visualization results. We therefore introduce a taxonomy of interaction technique for 3D visualization. The taxonomy is organized along two axes: the primary source of input on the one hand and the visualization task they support on the other hand. Surveying the state of the art allows us to highlight specific challenges and missed opportunities for research in 3D visualization. In particular, we call for additional research in: (1) controlling 3D visualization widgets to help scientists better understand their data, (2) 3D interaction techniques for dissemination, which are under‐explored yet show great promise for helping museum and science centers in their mission to share recent knowledge, and (3) developing new measures that move beyond traditional time and errors metrics for evaluating visualizations that include spatial interaction.

show abstract

Section: Survey Of the State Of The Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

The State of the Art of Spatial Interfaces for 3D Visualization

Besançon

Ynnerman²,

Keefe

et al. 2021

Computer Graphics Forum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This may be a time consuming and in potential frustrating process prone for error due to third person interaction. 19,38,39…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identification of Meaningful Data for Providing Real-Time Intraoperative Feedback in Laparoscopic Surgery Using Delphi Analysis

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Surgeons are at risk of being overwhelmed with information while performing surgery. Initiatives focusing on the use of medical data in the operating room are on the rise. Currently, these initiatives require postprocessing of data. Although highly informative, data cannot be used to influence preventable error in real time. Ideally, feedback is provided preemptive. Aims. First, to identify which information is considered to be relevant for real-time feedback during laparoscopic surgery according to surgeons. Second, to identify the optimal routing for providing such feedback, and third, to decide on optimal timing for feedback to alarm users during laparoscopic surgery. Methods. A Delphi study of 3 iterations was conducted within the Amsterdam UMC, location AMC. A total of 25 surgeons and surgical residents performing laparoscopy were surveyed using 5-point Likert scales. Consensus was obtained when 80% of answers fitted the same answering category. Results. Delphi round 1 resulted in 198 unique ideas within 5 scenarios. After round 3, consensus was obtained on 102 items. Feedback most relevant during laparoscopic surgery refers to equipment like the gas insufflator, diathermy, and suction device. Feedback should be delivered via an additional monitor. Surgeons want to be instantly alarmed about aberrations in patients’ vital parameters or combinations of vital parameters, preferably via a designated section on a monitor in their field of vision. Conclusions. Surgeons performing laparoscopy are uniform in their opinion that they need to be alarmed immediately when patients’ vital parameters are becoming aberrant. Surgeons state that information regarding supporting equipment is best displayed on an additional monitor.

show abstract

“…The majority of gestural research in the OR is focused on the manipulation of medical images during a surgical case wherein the hand is an input device and acts as a pointer or mouse (Bizzotto et al, 2014;Jacob & Wachs, 2014;Jacob, Wachs, & Packer, 2013;Mewes, Saalfeld, Riabikin, Skalej, & Hansen, 2016;O'Hara et al, 2014). However, anesthesia providers could additionally benefit from gestural input technology as they also interact with patients throughout the surgical process (Miller & Pardo, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%