2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A ghostwriter in the machine? Attitudes of academic staff towards machine translation use in internationalised Higher Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some misconceptions about the use of machine translation. The study of Groves and Mundt (2021) shows that even some teachers do not accept using machine translation as a form of academic misconduct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are some misconceptions about the use of machine translation. The study of Groves and Mundt (2021) shows that even some teachers do not accept using machine translation as a form of academic misconduct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, many studies explore the relationship between a poor level of English and academic integrity violations, specifically plagiarism 2007;Goh, 2015;Perkins et al, 2018). Moreover, the use of machine translation in foreign language classes as a form of academic misconduct was discussed in some papers (Clifford et al, 2013;Groves & Mundt, 2021). Evidently, investigating academic integrity violations in online English teaching has clear implications on the quality of foreign language education.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groves and Mundt gave “the model, method, and design of constructivist teaching.” It is proposed that the center of the constructivist teaching mode is learners and learners, as the core of cognition, construct knowledge and construct meaning [ 9 ]. Warner and Dupuy did research and thinking on teaching Chinese as a foreign language based on constructivism theory.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prohibiting or discouraging the use of OTs, many language teachers consider their use as a form of academic dishonesty (Clifford, Merschel, & Munné, 2013;Correa, 2014;Niño, 2009). However, the frequent and extensive use of OTs among language learners (Briggs, 2018) suggests that incorporating or at least accepting the use of OT in the language curriculum is inevitable (Groves & Mundt, 2021). Recent studies have, in fact, shown benefits of OT use in second language (L2) writing, such as improvement in lexical and grammatical accuracy, vocabulary development, and reduction of writing anxiety (Tsai, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%