2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A GIS-based multi-criteria decision making approach to forest conservation planning at a landscape scale: a case study in the Kinabalu Area, Sabah, Malaysia

Abstract: This paper presents a geographic information system (GIS)-based multi-criteria decision making approach for forest conservation planning at a landscape scale. This approach enables decision makers to evaluate the relative priorities of conserving forest areas based on a set of preferences, criteria and indicators for the area. Compromise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
110
0
10

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
110
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to reduce the subjectivity of setting weights, the weights were proposed using an expert-panel approach, i.e. 5 forestry and hydrology experts were asked to weight the criteria (as suggested for example by Sierra et al 2002, or Phua, Minowa 2005. Experts' background was hydrology (2 experts), forest bioclimatology (2 experts) and hydropedology (1 expert).…”
Section: Data Analysis and Multi-criteria Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to reduce the subjectivity of setting weights, the weights were proposed using an expert-panel approach, i.e. 5 forestry and hydrology experts were asked to weight the criteria (as suggested for example by Sierra et al 2002, or Phua, Minowa 2005. Experts' background was hydrology (2 experts), forest bioclimatology (2 experts) and hydropedology (1 expert).…”
Section: Data Analysis and Multi-criteria Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the subjectivity of decisions concerning selection and preferences of input criteria, several experts' inputs can be used, and thus one can arrive at the selection of more robust criteria and weight assignment (e.g. Sierra et al 2002;Phua, Minowa 2005), as has been presented in this study. Sophisticated approaches to coping with subjective judgement in multi-criteria decision making have been proposed, for example, by Yeh and Chang (2009) or Anisseh and Yusuff (2011).…”
Section: Relationship Between Watershed Natural Conditions and Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodology has been successfully applied to combine geographic information system (GIS) information and forest planning (Phua and Minowa, 2005). Recently, this methodology was integrated with both bioenergy and multifunctionality assessment in a GIS environment (Sacchelli et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Aggregation Of Parameters and Objective Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the potential of MCDA model for integration to deal with spatial units problems, it gained attention only in a certain period of times in some practical researches and managerial limits [15] . Urban planners used the strategy of MCDA integration for dealing with spatial issues from 1990s [38] . A city system can not be studied only by considering the simple concepts like land use or traffic.…”
Section: What Is Ahp?mentioning
confidence: 99%