2017
DOI: 10.1111/tgis.12274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A GIS‐based multi‐criteria seismic vulnerability assessment using the integration of granular computing rule extraction and artificial neural networks

Abstract: This study proposes multi-criteria group decision-making to address seismic physical vulnerability assessment. Granular computing rule extraction is combined with a feed forward artificial neural network to form a classifier capable of training a neural network on the basis of the rules provided by granular computing. It provides a transparent structure despite the traditional multi-layer neural networks. It also allows the classifier to be applied on a set of rules for each incoming pattern. Drawbacks of orig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most important feature of neural network is that it has nonlinear, adaptive and powerful learning function and error correction function. This is also consistent with the complexity and nonlinear characteristics of slope stability, so the study of slope deformation has a good basis for mathematical model research [17]. As shown in figure 1.…”
Section: A the Principle Of Artificial Neural Networksupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The most important feature of neural network is that it has nonlinear, adaptive and powerful learning function and error correction function. This is also consistent with the complexity and nonlinear characteristics of slope stability, so the study of slope deformation has a good basis for mathematical model research [17]. As shown in figure 1.…”
Section: A the Principle Of Artificial Neural Networksupporting
confidence: 73%
“…However, decision making for estimating building damage involves some uncertainties [22]. Limited number of studies have focused on dealing with intrinsic uncertainties of multiple decision making for assessing seismic vulnerability of buildings ([e.g., References [2,[23][24][25][26]). This paper focuses on studying one of the epistemic uncertainties in assessing seismic vulnerability of buildings namely inconsistency in a multi criteria decision making framework using fuzzy sets and Dempster-Shafer theories implemented on vector datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seismic vulnerability criteria that are considered in this study include topographic slope in percent (slope), intensity of earthquake per unit (MMI), the percentage of poor quality buildings with four floors or less (Buil_Less4), the percentage of poor quality buildings with more than four floors (Buil_more4), the percentage of buildings constructed before 1966 (Bef-66), the percentage of buildings constructed between 1966 and1988 (Bet-66-88). (Aghataher et al, 2005, Silavi et al, 2006, Amiri et al, 2008, Samadi Alinia and Delavar, 2011, Khamespanah et al, 2016, Moradi et al 2017and Sheikhian et al 2017. Since Iranian regulations for building designs have been approved in 1966, buildings constructed before this date are considered as non-standard constructions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khamespanah et al (2016) have investigated Tehran physical seismic vulnerability using the integration of granular computing and rough set theory. Sheikhian et al (2017) have studied Tehran seismic vulnerability using a neural network and granular computing integrated model. Moradi et al (2016) have developed an integrated model of Choquet integral and game theory for Tehran physical vulnerability assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%