2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0098-3004(01)00097-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A GIS method for reconstruction of late Quaternary landscapes from isobase data and modern topography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The selection of TIN method was based on e.g. Burrough & McDonnell (1998), Oksanen (1998), Leverington et al (2002) and Mäkiaho (2007), who noted that the TIN interpolation works best when creating digital topography from irregularly spaced data points with variable elevation. In addition, Oksanen (1998) previously tested that TIN model and trend surface interpolations are the most suitable methods to interpolate the geographically varying level of the ancient shorelines of the Baltic Sea basin in Finland.…”
Section: Shoreline Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of TIN method was based on e.g. Burrough & McDonnell (1998), Oksanen (1998), Leverington et al (2002) and Mäkiaho (2007), who noted that the TIN interpolation works best when creating digital topography from irregularly spaced data points with variable elevation. In addition, Oksanen (1998) previously tested that TIN model and trend surface interpolations are the most suitable methods to interpolate the geographically varying level of the ancient shorelines of the Baltic Sea basin in Finland.…”
Section: Shoreline Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate the reservoir geometry of the superlake, we employ the methods described by Mann et al (1999) and Leverington et al (2002b). Based on modern topographic data (30 Â 30 arcsec cells; GLOBE Task Team, 1999) and bathymetric data for Hudson Bay (5 Â 5 arcmin cells; National Geophysical Data Center, 1988), a digital elevation model (DEM) of the present day topographic surface was constructed.…”
Section: Reservoir Geometry and Lake Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the minimum measured paleoshoreline elevation value attributed to a water plane was subtracted from the respective water plane raster; the result represented differential rebound relative to the lowest sampled feature. Next, each relative rebound raster was subtracted from a contemporary digital elevation model (DEM), thereby generating a set of three proglacial elevation models that reflected the immense weight of the Laurentide ice sheet; this mapping method is similar the methods used by Krist and Schaetzl (2001), Drzyzga et al (2002) and Leverington et al (2002). Finally, elevations greater than the aforementioned lowest measured elevation were classified as above water; the balance was classified as not above water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%