2016
DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000000880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global agenda for electronic injury surveillance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,10,19,[27][28][29] These impediments not only make injury surveillance efforts costly and inefficient, they often result in trauma databases lagging months behind. 1,20,21,23,26,30 With the creation of the eTHR, we have sought to shift the injury surveillance responsibilities from teams of data analysts that are not available in LMICs because of costs and limited resources to busy frontline clinicians. It is well known, however, that frontline clinicians are often reluctant to use surveillance tools that they view as burdensome, requiring large time investments without any immediate benefits to workflow or patient care.…”
Section: Platform Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4,10,19,[27][28][29] These impediments not only make injury surveillance efforts costly and inefficient, they often result in trauma databases lagging months behind. 1,20,21,23,26,30 With the creation of the eTHR, we have sought to shift the injury surveillance responsibilities from teams of data analysts that are not available in LMICs because of costs and limited resources to busy frontline clinicians. It is well known, however, that frontline clinicians are often reluctant to use surveillance tools that they view as burdensome, requiring large time investments without any immediate benefits to workflow or patient care.…”
Section: Platform Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the challenges of building trauma systems—the establishment of conventional trauma registries—has proven difficult because of data collection costs, large hospital admission volumes, and limited public health personnel . As a result, trauma registries have been largely absent in LMICs …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[10][11][12][13] A critical first step in the development of these trauma systems is the collection and analysis of injury data in the form of a trauma registry. 14 Trauma registries record information related to the injury event, process of care, and outcome of the injured patient. 9 15 These data are vital to informed decision-making across the entire continuum of trauma care from injury prevention and mitigation to pre-hospital and hospital care, and finally rehabilitation and community care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%