2022
DOI: 10.3390/app12168275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Global Analysis of Research Outputs on Neurotoxicants from 2011–2020: Adverse Effects on Humans and the Environment

Abstract: Neurotoxicants are detrimental to the mammalian nervous system at higher concentrations after exposure, and could result in several neurological abnormalities, especially on the nervous and reproductive systems, and sometimes death. The present study, therefore, aimed to evaluate the research growth on neurotoxicants and their effects on humans and the environment over the last decade from 2011 to 2020. Data on this subject were obtained from the SCI-Expanded of Web of Science, and analyses were performed on t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with the findings of the present study, previous reports of bibliometric studies from authors who assessed studies in other fields often discovered that knowledge drivers (researchers) of most bibliometric studies are from countries with financially stable economies such as the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, and China, with very few contributions coming from authors based in developing/low-income countries (Orimoloye and Ololade, 2021;Smith et al, 2021;Tywabi-Ngeva et al, 2022). The foremost countries with networks/collaborations on livestock husbandry and food security research mostly networked or formed alliances with other developed countries, while on few occasions they networked with authors from other developing nations whose governments give little or no attention and sponsorship to research work that has the potential of positively impacting their countries' economies and knowledge advancement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In agreement with the findings of the present study, previous reports of bibliometric studies from authors who assessed studies in other fields often discovered that knowledge drivers (researchers) of most bibliometric studies are from countries with financially stable economies such as the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, and China, with very few contributions coming from authors based in developing/low-income countries (Orimoloye and Ololade, 2021;Smith et al, 2021;Tywabi-Ngeva et al, 2022). The foremost countries with networks/collaborations on livestock husbandry and food security research mostly networked or formed alliances with other developed countries, while on few occasions they networked with authors from other developing nations whose governments give little or no attention and sponsorship to research work that has the potential of positively impacting their countries' economies and knowledge advancement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…With respect to the amount of research output, nations from stable economies (e.g., the United Kingdom, United States, and China) usually show dominance on the international stage (Geaney et al, 2015;Bruggmann et al, 2017;Idamokoro and Hosu, 2022b). In addition, these developed nations tend to network and collaborate in the area of research with other developed countries thereby neglecting nations from developing societies (Orimoloye and Ololade, 2021;Smith et al, 2021;Tywabi-Ngeva et al, 2022). Alliances between developed and developing nations are rare in scholarly studies (Orimoloye and Ololade, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%