2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.comgeo.2004.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global approach to automatic solution of jigsaw puzzles

Abstract: We present a new algorithm for automatically solving jigsaw puzzles by shape alone. The algorithm can solve more difficult puzzles than could be solved before, without the use of backtracking or branch-and-bound. The algorithm can handle puzzles in which pieces border more than four neighbors, and puzzles with as many as 200 pieces. Our overall strategy follows that of previous algorithms but applies a number of new ideas, such as robust fiducial points, "highest-confidence-first" search, and frequent global r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mandibular fragments are classified as terminal or non-terminal, based on the presence or absence of condyles (an extremity of the human mandible that exhibits pronounced sphericity), respectively. It is worth-mentioning that this type of prior rudimentary classification of the bone fragments to be assembled is similar to the schemes of Wolfson et al [9] and Goldberg et al [12] in the con- the border pieces as indents, outdents and flat sides. A terminal fragment in our case is similar to a border piece of a jigsaw puzzle whereas a non-terminal fragment corresponds to an interior piece of a jigsaw puzzle.…”
Section: Design Of a Score Matrixmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mandibular fragments are classified as terminal or non-terminal, based on the presence or absence of condyles (an extremity of the human mandible that exhibits pronounced sphericity), respectively. It is worth-mentioning that this type of prior rudimentary classification of the bone fragments to be assembled is similar to the schemes of Wolfson et al [9] and Goldberg et al [12] in the con- the border pieces as indents, outdents and flat sides. A terminal fragment in our case is similar to a border piece of a jigsaw puzzle whereas a non-terminal fragment corresponds to an interior piece of a jigsaw puzzle.…”
Section: Design Of a Score Matrixmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Leitato and Stolfi [11] use multi-scale filtering, an initial matching followed by refinement and pruning of the search space with incremental dynamic programming to solve the 2D jigsaw puzzle problem. Goldberg et al [12], on the other hand, address the same problem of 2D jigsaw puzzle reconstruction with a global relaxation approach after detection of fiducial points (robust canonical locations) on the 2D jigsaw puzzle pieces. Makridis and Papamarkos [13] propose a new technique which employs both geometrical and color features for jigsaw puzzle matching.…”
Section: Literature Review and Our Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sherds of pottery), see e.g. Cooper et al (2002), Kampel and Sablatnig (2003a, b), da Gama Leit茫o and Stolfi (2002), Goldberg et al (2004), Willis and Cooper (2004). However, these methods cannot be generalized to fragments of 3D solids.…”
Section: Reassembly Of Broken Objectsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Using Freeman and Gardner's [5] fundamental work on the reconstruction of apictorial jigsaw as a starting point, many of these papers [6][7][8][9] deal with the computerized solution to jigsaw puzzles by use of features extracted from the shape of the puzzle pieces alone. A few more recent approaches involve the use of chromatic (color) content in the determination of successful piece matches.…”
Section: Relevant Workmentioning
confidence: 99%