2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-018-0292-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Global Assessment of the Effects of Eucalyptus Plantations on Stream Ecosystem Functioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, according to Cravino and Brazeiro [86] grassland afforestation generates a negative impact at a local scale on the assemblage of mediumand large-sized native mammals, reducing cumulative species richness and capture rate compared with grasslands. Freshwater ecosystem modifications have shown that litter decomposition was inhibited at 36% in Uruguay [87] without significant differences in water chemistry between forested and not forested basins, information that does not agree with the water stream acidification reported by Farley [88]. Results that are now important for two dimensions of LCA are water footprint and lost biodiversity.…”
Section: Eroi Carbon Footprint and Other Footprintsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Currently, according to Cravino and Brazeiro [86] grassland afforestation generates a negative impact at a local scale on the assemblage of mediumand large-sized native mammals, reducing cumulative species richness and capture rate compared with grasslands. Freshwater ecosystem modifications have shown that litter decomposition was inhibited at 36% in Uruguay [87] without significant differences in water chemistry between forested and not forested basins, information that does not agree with the water stream acidification reported by Farley [88]. Results that are now important for two dimensions of LCA are water footprint and lost biodiversity.…”
Section: Eroi Carbon Footprint and Other Footprintsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…2 – 4 ). A random distribution of sites was unfeasible, so some regions were underrepresented (mostly Africa and northern Asia), which is usually the case for globally distributed experiments 28 , 49 , 50 . Streams were similar in size (mean ± SE: wetted channel width, 3.9 ± 0.1 m; water depth, 28.7 ± 0.4 cm; 1st–3rd order) and physical habitat (alternating riffles and pools).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atualmente, a invasão biológica, causada de forma intencional pelas atividades antrópicas ou indiretas, pela fragilidade do sistema natural, tem sido uma das principais causas de perda de diversidade. A substituição de espécies arbóreas nativas por espécies exóticas invasoras nas margens de rios e riachos tem sido relatada como um fator importante na alteração do funcionamento destes ecossistemas aquáticos (BOYERO et al, 2012;FERREIRA et al, 2019). Uma vez estabelecidas em zonas ripárias, as plantas exóticas invasoras podem reduzir a diversidade e qualidade de serapilheira disponível como fonte de recursos energético para a biota e, consequentemente, para a cadeia trófica aquática (KUGLEROVÁ et al, 2017;.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Em regiões onde os invertebrados fragmentadores são abundantes, as plantações de Eucalyptus sp. parecem inibir a decomposição dos detritos, reduzindo a abundância destes organismos (FERREIRA et al, 2019). Esses resultados podem estar relacionados com a baixa qualidade das folhas de eucalipto para os fragmentadores (CANHOTO; GRAÇA, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified