2018
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global database and “state of the field” review of research into ecosystem engineering by land animals

Abstract: Ecosystem engineers have been widely studied for terrestrial systems, but global trends in research encompassing the range of taxa and functions have not previously been synthesised. We reviewed contemporary understanding of engineer fauna in terrestrial habitats and assessed the methods used to document patterns and processes, asking: (a) which species act as ecosystem engineers and with whom do they interact? (b) What are the impacts of ecosystem engineers in terrestrial habitats and how are they distributed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
118
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 239 publications
2
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Returning locally extinct fauna has recently been recognised as a key component of ecosystem restoration because such species may play trophic or engineering roles important for ecosystem structure (Wilmers and Schmitz 2016, Sobral-Souza et al 2017, Schweiger et al 2018). However, the value of reinstating species for ecosystem function is also likely to be context-dependent (Coggan et al 2016(Coggan et al , 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Returning locally extinct fauna has recently been recognised as a key component of ecosystem restoration because such species may play trophic or engineering roles important for ecosystem structure (Wilmers and Schmitz 2016, Sobral-Souza et al 2017, Schweiger et al 2018). However, the value of reinstating species for ecosystem function is also likely to be context-dependent (Coggan et al 2016(Coggan et al , 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This differentiates ecosystem engineers from keystone species, which are defined as species which have a disproportionately large effect on the ecological community relative to their abundance (Paine, 1995) purely by biotic (trophic) interactions, e.g. predation (Coggan, Hayward & Gibb, 2018). These two concepts are particularly relevant in the context of trophic rewilding when (re)introduced species are expected to have a strong impact on the ecosystem (Byers et al, 2006;Svenning et al, 2016).…”
Section: (1) Properties Of the Megafauna Considered For Trophic Rewilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loss of these ecosystem engineers may lead to a subsequent loss of the ecological processes they perform and important plant–animal interactions. Globally, conservation efforts include reintroductions of threatened species, increasingly not only for the conservation of species themselves, but also in attempts to restore lost ecosystem functions (e.g., Law, Gaywood, Jones, Ramsay, & Willby, ); and greater understanding on the role of digging mammals in ecosystem function is therefore required (Coggan et al., ). Australia has the world's highest record of mammal extinction in the last 200 years (Woinarski, Burbidge, & Harrison, ), and a large proportion of extant digging marsupials are threatened or have suffered severe range contractions (Fleming et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%