2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global multicenter study on reference values: 1. Assessment of methods for derivation and comparison of reference intervals

Abstract: The collaborative study enabled us to evaluate rational methods for deriving RIs and comparing the RVs based on real-world datasets obtained in a harmonized manner.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
56
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
56
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As parameters routinely used for clinical interpretation, reference intervals were first described in 1969 (1) and defined as prediction intervals that include the central 95% of reference values (2). It is necessary to establish RIs for common analytes at large three-level general hospitals because the concentration of a given analyte may be affected by various factors such as gender, age, and ethnicity, among others (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As parameters routinely used for clinical interpretation, reference intervals were first described in 1969 (1) and defined as prediction intervals that include the central 95% of reference values (2). It is necessary to establish RIs for common analytes at large three-level general hospitals because the concentration of a given analyte may be affected by various factors such as gender, age, and ethnicity, among others (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For international comparison, the use of a panel of sera is set as the key strategy for aligning test results among laboratories ( 3 ). The global RIs project initiated by C-RIDL involving many countries, including Turkey, aimed to promote harmonized derivation of reliable country-specific RIs through multicentre studies and to compare reference values (RVs) among the countries using these strategies ( 4 ). We joined the global project and conducted a nationwide multicentre study to establish RIs of the Turkish population for biochemical parameters and to explore sources of variation in RVs, including regionality ( 5 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AFP, CEA, CA125, and PRL didn't show significant between-country differences according to the global paper results (SDR of 0.12, 0.13, 0.21 and 0.12 for males and 0.18, 0.15, 0.05 and 0.14 for females, respectively) [18]. For CA-125, the UL for females in the Asian study was higher than those provided in the Russian study and both were higher than UL provided by the manufacturer in the instruction for use.…”
Section: ) Distinction Between Ris and Cdlsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In any case, it should be noted, that there is no common RI and the fluctuation of UL range could make from 2.5 to 5.5 mIU/ml. It is apparent that, Cortisol exhibits a slight between-country difference (SDR of 0.28 for male, 0.29 for female) [18].…”
Section: ) Distinction Between Ris and Cdlsmentioning
confidence: 97%