2016
DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.1563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Global Perspective of Beauty in a Multicultural World

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, one should carefully choose a sample of evaluators that represent the population of the target audience depending on the purpose of the study (e.g., high-school students, average citizens, or corporate audience). Despite the established correlations (see Supplementary Information) between the Anaface proxy and geometry-based attractiveness measures such as facial symmetry, neoclassical canons, and golden ratio, the cross-cultural validity of the latter two are problematic (Chen and Zhang, 2014;Heidekrueger et al, 2017) as they are Eurocentric constructions based on Greco-Roman and Western ideals (Bashour, 2006;Thomas and Dixon, 2016). Therefore, these measures are potentially less relevant for studies examining perceived facial attractiveness of non-Western cultures compared to facial averageness or symmetry that are biologically relevant measures of attractiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, one should carefully choose a sample of evaluators that represent the population of the target audience depending on the purpose of the study (e.g., high-school students, average citizens, or corporate audience). Despite the established correlations (see Supplementary Information) between the Anaface proxy and geometry-based attractiveness measures such as facial symmetry, neoclassical canons, and golden ratio, the cross-cultural validity of the latter two are problematic (Chen and Zhang, 2014;Heidekrueger et al, 2017) as they are Eurocentric constructions based on Greco-Roman and Western ideals (Bashour, 2006;Thomas and Dixon, 2016). Therefore, these measures are potentially less relevant for studies examining perceived facial attractiveness of non-Western cultures compared to facial averageness or symmetry that are biologically relevant measures of attractiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also true that our perception of beauty and norms of facial proportion are changing as we see globalization of beauty. 6,7 The surgeon must therefore consider his or her sense of facial gestalt in making assessments.…”
Section: Alar Anatomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Universal attributes of beauty tend to include youthfulness and symmetry as well as sexual dimorphism and averageness. 3,4 In training, we learn that optimal attractiveness is accomplished by producing attractive facial proportions and symmetry. We also must take into consideration the age, race, gender, and, most importantly, desires of the particular patient.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%