2015
DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2014.890656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Global Relation of Fire Smoke Re-Circulation Behaviour in Urban Street Canyons

Abstract: Street canyon, formed by buildings along two sides of a road, is an important and ubiquitous architectural element in the metropolises. When a fire occurs in an urban street canyon, a critical serious phenomenon is found to happen where the uprising fire smoke is re-circulated back into the base of the street canyon by the wind flow beyond a critical velocity. Theoretical analysis is derived based on Froude number (Fr), by balancing the inertial force of the wind flow to the buoyancy strength of the fire smoke… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease in the critical velocity for different street widths could be effectively proposed through a series of simple equations, such as , displayed in the right corner of Figure 7 . It is seen that the β coefficients are all close to −0.3, which is consistent with previous investigations by Hu [ 31 ], where . In the meantime, for an ideal street canyon with an aspect ratio of n = 1, the critical recirculation velocity is shown to be almost constant at around 2.8–2.9 m/s (see the ellipse in Figure 7 ); hence, the average critical recirculation velocity for ideal street canyons is suggested to be 2.84 m/s.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The decrease in the critical velocity for different street widths could be effectively proposed through a series of simple equations, such as , displayed in the right corner of Figure 7 . It is seen that the β coefficients are all close to −0.3, which is consistent with previous investigations by Hu [ 31 ], where . In the meantime, for an ideal street canyon with an aspect ratio of n = 1, the critical recirculation velocity is shown to be almost constant at around 2.8–2.9 m/s (see the ellipse in Figure 7 ); hence, the average critical recirculation velocity for ideal street canyons is suggested to be 2.84 m/s.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Then, a uniform inlet velocity boundary condition was set on the left side of the simulation domain as representative of the ambient cross-wind. The configuration abides by some previous works by Hu [ 20 , 21 , 31 ], Zhang [ 26 , 30 ] and Pesic [ 23 ], but the wind profile was not considered in these works. The wind direction was perpendicular to the building, but the velocity of the cross-wind was altered step by step in the simulation to search for the critical smoke recirculation velocity of the street canyon, which was determined visually from the smoke dispersion throughout the simulation time period.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[6][7][8] The airflow structure and pollutant distribution can be affected by many factors, including meteorological conditions, building structure, traffic flow, the effects of canopy properties, location and shape of pollution sources and so on. [9][10][11][12][13] The building structure is the main factor that could affect the airflow structure and pollutant distribution. 14 Therefore, in order to find a way to reduce the damage of air pollution to the human body, the study of the influence of building structure characteristics of street canyon on airflow structure and pollutant distribution is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies in an open space pool fire accident exist [29][30][31][32][33][34][35], as well as for a pollutant dispersion in a street canyon [17,18,36,37]. However, only a few of them focus on the study of a fire accident inside a street canyon [21,[38][39][40][41][42]. The pollutant dispersion into an array of cubes has been studied experimentally and computationally [10,43,44]; however, there is a lack of documentation for a fire incident inside an array of cubes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%