2021
DOI: 10.5194/essd-2021-313
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global seamless 1 km resolution daily land surface temperature dataset (2003–2020)

Abstract: Abstract. Land surface temperature (LST) is one of the most important and widely used parameter for studying land surface processes. Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) LST products (e.g., MOD11A1 and MYD11A1) can provide this information with high spatiotemporal resolution with global coverage. However, the broad applications of these data are hampered because of missing values caused by factors such as cloud contamination. In this study, we used a spatiotemporal gap-filling framework to gen… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monthly anomaly variations in global LST and AT are shown in 2014)) were used to characterize the AT variation (Figure 11a). Other all-sky LST datasets were averaged and shown to verify the GHA-LST anomaly, including two MODIS-derived gap-free results, as shown in Table 1 (Hong et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2022) The LST anomaly couples well with the global AT anomaly at the Tmean and Tmin scales, and LST has a slightly larger amplitude than AT, whereas the Tmax and DTR of the two variables can only match the anomalous direction and the magnitude is quite different. At the Tmean scale, anomalies of GHA-LST and other LSTs have very similar variations with the AT datasets, even though they have completely different data sources (Figure 11a).…”
Section: Global Anomaly Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monthly anomaly variations in global LST and AT are shown in 2014)) were used to characterize the AT variation (Figure 11a). Other all-sky LST datasets were averaged and shown to verify the GHA-LST anomaly, including two MODIS-derived gap-free results, as shown in Table 1 (Hong et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2022) The LST anomaly couples well with the global AT anomaly at the Tmean and Tmin scales, and LST has a slightly larger amplitude than AT, whereas the Tmax and DTR of the two variables can only match the anomalous direction and the magnitude is quite different. At the Tmean scale, anomalies of GHA-LST and other LSTs have very similar variations with the AT datasets, even though they have completely different data sources (Figure 11a).…”
Section: Global Anomaly Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the training samples of T dm ( T sb ) can also be from geostationary satellite data, which can help reduce the computational complexity of the DTC modeling. Third, other highly efficient under-cloud LST reconstruction methods, such as statistical interpolation, spatiotemporal fusion, and the passive microwave-based method (Wu et al, 2021;Hong et al, 2021), or the generated under-cloud LST products (Zhang et al, 2022;Zhao et al, 2020) can replace the ATC model in the T dm generation framework. Similarly, more efficient diurnal LST dynamics modeling methods can also replace the DTC model (Jia et al, 2022).…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long‐term satellite‐retrieved LST and land‐cover data provide a self‐consistent standard and enable comparative analysis of the RSUHI spatial pattern and scale over urban agglomerations from a regional perspective. A global seamless 1‐km‐resolution daily clear‐sky LST data set for 2003–2020, retrieved from the Mid‐Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on Terra and Aqua satellites and generated by using a spatiotemporal gap‐filling framework to gap‐fill missing values in the initial MODIS/LST (X. Zhang, Liu, et al., 2022; T. Zhang, Zhou, et al., 2022), was used to quantify the RSUHIs in the YRD urban agglomeration. The Terra and Aqua combined 500‐m‐resolution land‐cover data set (MCD12Q1, 2001–2020) was used to extract the land cover types of croplands, forests and urban areas (Abercrombie & Friedl, 2016).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Terra and Aqua combined 500‐m‐resolution land‐cover data set (MCD12Q1, 2001–2020) was used to extract the land cover types of croplands, forests and urban areas (Abercrombie & Friedl, 2016). A 30‐m‐resolution Landsat impervious surface data set at a 5‐year interval (GISD30, 1985–2020) (X. Zhang et al., 2022; T. Zhang et al., 2022) was used to investigate the expansion of suburbs and small towns around the large cities.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%