2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2015.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global view of osteopathic practice – mirror or echo chamber?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Osteopathy is considered a manual therapy discipline in which its therapeutic base has been traditionally embedded within a specific conceptual framework and principles [17][18][19]. However, several authors have questioned the validity, plausibility and utility of these traditional osteopathic models in the context of contemporary evidence-based healthcare [20][21][22][23]. Despite the passing of time, most of these osteopathic models have not been updated in response to the evidence, yielding to an uncritical development of the profession [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osteopathy is considered a manual therapy discipline in which its therapeutic base has been traditionally embedded within a specific conceptual framework and principles [17][18][19]. However, several authors have questioned the validity, plausibility and utility of these traditional osteopathic models in the context of contemporary evidence-based healthcare [20][21][22][23]. Despite the passing of time, most of these osteopathic models have not been updated in response to the evidence, yielding to an uncritical development of the profession [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2013, the Osteopathic International Alliance (OIA) attempted to identify the number of osteopaths working worldwide [4]. Although this was an essential preliminary stage in describing the scope and characteristics of osteopathic practice, this approach produced a significant reporting bias, particularly in those countries where osteopathy is still unregulated as is the case in Spain [5]. Within this uncertain scenario, the Spanish Ministry of Health, Social Policy and Equality published in 2011 the report "Analysis of the situation of natural therapies".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a first attempt to identify the number of osteopaths worldwide, the OIA [4] asked the various national voluntary registers, professional associations and regulatory bodies in osteopathy, to provide estimates of the numbers of practitioners working in their respective countries. Although this was an important preliminary stage in describing the scope and characteristics of osteopathic practice, this approach produced a significant reporting bias, particularly in those countries where the unregulated nature of osteopathy is still a major concern [5]. In several countries where osteopathy is statutorily regulated, workforce surveys are regularly conducted [6–17]; however, the prevalence of osteopathic practitioners, their professional profile and features of clinical practice, particularly where statutory regulation does not exist, are still significantly underreported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%