2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global Water Quality Index and hot-deck imputation of missing data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
87
1
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
87
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…A general evaluation is in agreement with the conclusion reached by Srebotnjak et al (2012): "no single widely accepted method has emerged and furthermore, all currently used indices are restricted in their applicability and scope, because each author adopted different indicators, weights and sub-indices. "…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A general evaluation is in agreement with the conclusion reached by Srebotnjak et al (2012): "no single widely accepted method has emerged and furthermore, all currently used indices are restricted in their applicability and scope, because each author adopted different indicators, weights and sub-indices. "…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Horton's pioneering effort was followed by several WQI variations, whose use has been strongly advocated by agencies responsible for water supply and water pollution control (Bharti and Katyal, 2001). Over the years many indices have been calculated, each for its own purpose (Štambuk-Giljanović, 1999;Bharti and Katyal, 2001;Nasirian, 2007;Srebotnjak et al, 2012). The basic difference between these indices is the way that their sub-indices were developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…q i is a dimensionless number with a domain, where 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 denote very little, little, average, great, and greatest importance, respectively (Semiromi et al, 2011). And finally the WQI was generated as an aggregation of the sub-indices following a weighted aggregation method using the weighted sum model as per (Semiromi et al, 2011;Srebotnjak et al, 2012).…”
Section: Drinking Water Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%