1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf01442901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A globally convergent, implementable multiplier method with automatic penalty limitation

Abstract: Abstract. This paper deals with penalty function and multiplier methods for the solution of constrained nonconvex nonlinear programming problems. Starting from an idea introduced several years ago by Polak, we develop a class of implementable methods which, under suitable assumptions, produce a sequence of points converging to a strong local minimum for the problem, regardless of the location of the initial guess. In addition, for sequential minimization type multiplier methods, we make use of a rate of conver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Penalization has been introduced by Courant [Cou43] and it is very common in optimization theory (see e.g. [Cea78] and [PT80]). Then we prove some a priori estimates for the penalized (ε-regularized) solution, and finally pass to the limit as ε → 0 to end up with the existence of the solution for the initial (non regularized) problem.…”
Section: The Source Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penalization has been introduced by Courant [Cou43] and it is very common in optimization theory (see e.g. [Cea78] and [PT80]). Then we prove some a priori estimates for the penalized (ε-regularized) solution, and finally pass to the limit as ε → 0 to end up with the existence of the solution for the initial (non regularized) problem.…”
Section: The Source Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the constraint q v ≤ q vs itself depends on the solution T , the authors are led to introduce and handle a system of equations and inequations involving a so-called quasi-variational inequality for which they prove the existence of solutions using penalization techniques. Penalization has been introduced by R. Courant [19] and it is very common in Optimization Theory (see e.g., [15] and [53]). For general results on (quasi-)variational inequalities and their utilization in economics, mechanics and physics, see among a vast literature [12,2,6,7,5,8,9,4,22,23,26,41,36,38,44,47,50,49,48].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the adaptive selection of the penalty parameter is often heuristic, in some contexts, authors have proposed formal adaptation rules that guarantee that an appropriate value of the parameter will eventually be obtained and will be kept for the remainder of the solution process; this goes back several decades (e.g., [30] as well as, in the context of augmented Lagrangian, [17,35]) and also includes more recent work such as [11,39]. Finally, in the past two decades, exact penalty functions have been used successfully in the solution of mathematical programs with complementary constraints (MPCC), e.g., [16,32] and references therein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%