2012
DOI: 10.17705/1jais.00294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Glorious and Not-So-Short History of the Information Systems Field

Abstract: Research Article Rudy HirschheimLouisiana State University rudy@lsu.edu Heinz K. Klein State University of New YorkIn this paper, the more than 40-year history of the information systems discipline is discussed by dividing history into four somewhat overlapping eras. For each era, important events that occurred are highlighted. The events are categorized as "management/governance of the IS function", "technology", "research themes", "research methodology ", "education", and "infrastructure" (organizations, con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
165
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
(190 reference statements)
2
165
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to specifics regarding the composition and evolution of the North American IS theoretical core, our findings also reveal several noteworthy insights regarding the nature of theoretical pluralism in IS research studies and the rapidly growing and fragmenting theoretical ecosystem that the North American IS community has used-topics which have of late been the focus of many researchers' intense speculation (Agarwal & Lucas, 2005;Benbasat & Zmud, 2003;Ginzberg, 2012;Grover, 2012;Hirschheim, 2007;Hirschheim & Klein, 2012;Todd, 2012;Walsham, 2012;Wastell, 2010). In the aggregate, our results point to a substantial degree of theoretical pluralism in North American IS research studies between 1990 and 2013, with researchers needing to rely on an average of approximately two unique theories per study to adequately address their phenomena of interest.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to specifics regarding the composition and evolution of the North American IS theoretical core, our findings also reveal several noteworthy insights regarding the nature of theoretical pluralism in IS research studies and the rapidly growing and fragmenting theoretical ecosystem that the North American IS community has used-topics which have of late been the focus of many researchers' intense speculation (Agarwal & Lucas, 2005;Benbasat & Zmud, 2003;Ginzberg, 2012;Grover, 2012;Hirschheim, 2007;Hirschheim & Klein, 2012;Todd, 2012;Walsham, 2012;Wastell, 2010). In the aggregate, our results point to a substantial degree of theoretical pluralism in North American IS research studies between 1990 and 2013, with researchers needing to rely on an average of approximately two unique theories per study to adequately address their phenomena of interest.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Paper 26 scholarship are still ongoing (and may never cease due to the field's evolving nature), research in this realm largely agrees that a key component of the IS research community's identity is its intellectual core, which particularly includes the primary theories that IS research studies use and advance (Hassan, 2011;Hirschheim & Klein, 2012;Neufeld, et al, 2007;Somers, 2010). Not only do the theories that a scientific field uses signal its boundaries (Benbasat & Zmud, 2003), but they also help to define the field's levels of cohesiveness and rigidity (Hassan, 2011), facilitate its impact on society (Walsham, 2012), determine the field's relevancy to practice (Ginzberg, 2012), and delimit the field's knowledge and academic domains (Somers, 2010).…”
Section: Connections Between Theory and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations