2020
DOI: 10.1093/jmcb/mjaa024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A ‘Goldmine’ for digging cancer-specific targets: the genes essential for embryo development but non-essential for adult life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cancer initiation is also associated with the activation of molecular signaling pathways that normally function during embryogenesis. However, developmental effects caused by mutation or loss of cancer-associated genes are often very different than adult phenotypes, as exemplified by early embryonic lethality versus adult cancer susceptibility 11 22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cancer initiation is also associated with the activation of molecular signaling pathways that normally function during embryogenesis. However, developmental effects caused by mutation or loss of cancer-associated genes are often very different than adult phenotypes, as exemplified by early embryonic lethality versus adult cancer susceptibility 11 22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, mutation or loss of cancer-associated genes can induce developmental effects in embryos that differ significantly from effects in adult animals. This frequently manifests as paradoxical embryonic lethality versus adult cancer susceptibility; examples include well-known tumor suppressor genes (Pten 11 , 12 , Rb 13 15 ), mediators of the DNA damage response (Atr 16 , 17 , Rad51 18 , 19 , Chek1 20 ), and others 21 , 22 . The constraints imposed by early embryonic lethality in these models is a limitation for investigations into how and why embryonic and adult cell populations respond so differently to certain cancer-associated genetic mutations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancer initiation is also associated with the activation of molecular signaling pathways that normally function during embryogenesis. However, developmental effects caused by mutation or loss of cancer-associated genes are often very different than adult phenotypes, as exemplified by early embryonic lethality versus adult cancer susceptibility [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, mutation or loss of cancer-associated genes can induce developmental effects in embryos that differ significantly from effects in adult animals. This frequently manifests as paradoxical embryonic lethality versus adult cancer susceptibility; examples include well-known tumor suppressor genes (Pten 11,12 , Rb 1315 ), mediators of the DNA damage response (Atr 16,17 , Rad51 18,19 , Chek1 20 ), and others 21,22 . The constraints imposed by early embryonic lethality in these models is a limitation for investigations into how and why embryonic and adult cell populations respond so differently to certain cancer-associated genetic mutations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, a better understating of how epigenetics influences the reactivation of fetal genes/the suppression of adult program may pave the way for new therapeutic solutions. As genes implicated in cell proliferation and differentiation play crucial roles during development, knockout of many of them is associated with embryonic/perinatal lethality [146]. Tissue specific or conditional gene targeting may represent a powerful tool to bypass the early lethality associated with global inactivation and thus to assess the contribution of genes during late development and PAH.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%