2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00184-010-0318-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A goodness-of-fit test for GARCH innovation density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective here is to construct goodness-of-fit (GOF) statistics for distributional assumptions regarding these count time series models. In the classical (continuous type) framework of time-series models, this aspect of modelling has drawn considerable attention recently; see [1][2][3][4][5]. The standard approach in constructing GOF tests is to estimate the corresponding density or distribution function and thereby construct versions of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Cramér-von Mises and Bickel-Rosenblatt statistics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective here is to construct goodness-of-fit (GOF) statistics for distributional assumptions regarding these count time series models. In the classical (continuous type) framework of time-series models, this aspect of modelling has drawn considerable attention recently; see [1][2][3][4][5]. The standard approach in constructing GOF tests is to estimate the corresponding density or distribution function and thereby construct versions of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Cramér-von Mises and Bickel-Rosenblatt statistics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, not knowing the nuisance location parameter has no effect on the asymptotic level of the test based on the analog of this statistic. Lee and Na (2002), Bachmann and Dette (2005) and Koul and Mimoto (2012) observed that this fact continues to hold for the analog of this test statistic when fitting an error density based on residuals in autoregressive and generalized autoregressive conditionally heteroscedastic time series models. This type of property makes these L 2 -distance type tests more desirable, compared to the tests based on residual empirical processes, because the asymptotic null distribution of the standardized residual empirical process depends on the estimators of the underlying nuisance parameters in these models in a complicated fashion, which renders it be unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%