2023
DOI: 10.1109/tvcg.2022.3174769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A GPU Parallel Algorithm for Computing Morse-Smale Complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, tachyon employs gradient path tracing from each saddle to compute the arcs. The gradient field and saddle‐extrema arc computation in g msc [SPN22] and pyms3d are identical. The only difference between the two implementations is that g msc uses CUDA whereas pyms3d uses OpenCL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, tachyon employs gradient path tracing from each saddle to compute the arcs. The gradient field and saddle‐extrema arc computation in g msc [SPN22] and pyms3d are identical. The only difference between the two implementations is that g msc uses CUDA whereas pyms3d uses OpenCL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their algorithm and the associated software library, pyms3d [SN17], leveraged GPU parallelism for gradient assignment and extrema traversal and CPU parallelism for saddle-saddle traversal. Recently, Subhash et al [SPN20,SPN22] introduced gmsc, an end-to-end GPU parallel algorithm for 3D Morse-Smale complex computation, which resulted in substantial speedups over the CPU and hybrid approaches attempted thus far. gmsc transforms the saddle-saddle computation into a sequence of matrix operations that are amenable to fast parallel computation on the GPU, leading to significant improvement in runtime.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, TACHYON employs gradient path tracing from each saddle to compute the arcs. The gradient field and saddle-extrema arc computation in gMSC [SPN22] and pyms3d are identical. The only difference between the two implementations is that gMSC uses CUDA whereas pyms3d uses OpenCL.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%