2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2013.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A gradient-constrained morphological filtering algorithm for airborne LiDAR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Sohn filter had heavy bias towards type II errors, while the Pfeifer had heavy bias towards type I errors. The proposed filter in this paper produced more type II errors than the Axelsson filter but less than the filter in [38]. The produced type II errors were mainly at the bottom where laddered buildings occurred.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Sohn filter had heavy bias towards type II errors, while the Pfeifer had heavy bias towards type I errors. The proposed filter in this paper produced more type II errors than the Axelsson filter but less than the filter in [38]. The produced type II errors were mainly at the bottom where laddered buildings occurred.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Although the filters proposed by Li et al [38] and this paper are both based on mathematical morphology, the strategies and performances of the two filters are different. Nonground objects usually appear around the feature points with dramatic height changes, so Li et al [38] focused on the redefinition of morphological openings to limit the filtered areas.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…morphological filters for classification in general areas are performing well, accurate classification of lidar point clouds in complex urban scenes including large and small objects with diverse elevation [2][3][4] is challenging. Classification results often depend on the assumptions made to the neighbours of each lidar point [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%