2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A gradient elastic homogenisation model for brick masonry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…URM is assumed to be a homogeneous and isotropic material [64][65][66][67][68]. The homogenized elastic modulus [69] and the other properties of masonry were retrieved from the literature [70][71][72][73][74].…”
Section: Modal Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…URM is assumed to be a homogeneous and isotropic material [64][65][66][67][68]. The homogenized elastic modulus [69] and the other properties of masonry were retrieved from the literature [70][71][72][73][74].…”
Section: Modal Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to mention that the deformation test did not depend on comparing the 3DPBDCB linear models with industrial hollow or bulk bricks since conventional industrial bricks don’t depend on elastic behaviour resulting from the geometrical design of the brick but rather on the material properties of the clay/ceramic itself . There are no unified criteria of comparison between the various geometrical designs of a brick and their elasticity with the conventional cuboid form of an industrial brick that its mechanical properties test depends more on its material and microstructure, as in [ 45 , 46 ], or its assembly in a full clay/masonry-brick wall [ 47 ] or the honeycomb form of a hollow brick. Thus, the authors decided to avoid the confusion between material properties and geometry properties that would occur if the 3DPBDCB linear models were compared to industrial bricks in the elasticity test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the computational costs associated with the distinct modelling of each constituent separately (e.g., brick and mortar), smeared cracking or continuum damage plasticity models for the homogenised material [38][39][40][41] have been proposed. Within this setting, the homogenisation theory has been a key approach to simplify the modelling difficulties related to the exact description of masonry constituents and their interactions in terms of material properties, as well as their geometry, yielding to a material which does not make a distinction between masonry units and mortar joints [42][43][44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%