2020
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaa240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A graph auto-encoder model for miRNA-disease associations prediction

Abstract: Emerging evidence indicates that the abnormal expression of miRNAs involves in the evolution and progression of various human complex diseases. Identifying disease-related miRNAs as new biomarkers can promote the development of disease pathology and clinical medicine. However, designing biological experiments to validate disease-related miRNAs is usually time-consuming and expensive. Therefore, it is urgent to design effective computational methods for predicting potential miRNA-disease associations. Inspired … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we compared the prediction performance of our model with other state-of-the-art methods, including PBMDA (You et al, 2017 ), GRNMF (Xiao et al, 2018 ), MDHGI (Chen et al, 2018e ), BNPMDA (Chen et al, 2018d ), MCLPMDA (Yu et al, 2019 ), NIMCGCN (Li et al, 2020a ), and GAEMDA (Li et al, 2020b ). We noted that different evaluation metrics and datasets are used in these methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, we compared the prediction performance of our model with other state-of-the-art methods, including PBMDA (You et al, 2017 ), GRNMF (Xiao et al, 2018 ), MDHGI (Chen et al, 2018e ), BNPMDA (Chen et al, 2018d ), MCLPMDA (Yu et al, 2019 ), NIMCGCN (Li et al, 2020a ), and GAEMDA (Li et al, 2020b ). We noted that different evaluation metrics and datasets are used in these methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, negative samples were needed for regression training. GAEMDA integrated similarities of diseases and miRNAs as features of nodes, applied a GCN model for further feature extraction, and then used a bilinear decoder for identification (Li et al, 2020b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to verify the accuracy of our method, the HGCNELMDA method was compared with the following four existing methods, namely FCGCNMDA [32], CNMDA[33], EDTMDA[34] and RKNNMDA [35], for five-fold cross-validation.As shown in Table 1, the AUC of FCGCNMDA, CNMDA, EDTMDA and RKNNMDA were 92.85%, 85.33%, 91.92% and 82.21%, respectively. Among them, the AUC of HGCNELMDA was the highest under five-fold cross-validation, with a value of 93.01%.Therefore, HGCNELMDA was proved to be reliable in miRNA-disease association.…”
Section: Compare With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Layer node embedding dimension is the node embedding parameter in GCN hidden layer ℎ , Different parameter values will affect the experimental results. As shown in Figure 5, define ℎ as [32,64,128,256,512], Compared with the AUC results, The validation methods of one-left cross-validation and five-fold cross-validation show that the AUC value presents an upward trend with the increase of node embedding dimension ℎ .The performance of the HGCNELMDA approach is highest when the embedding dimension ℎ is defined as 256.…”
Section: Comparison Of Parameter Sensitivitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DBNMDA ( Chen et al, 2020 ) constructed feature vectors for all miRNA–disease pairs to pretrain restricted Boltzmann machines and put the same amount of positive and negative samples into the deep-belief network to get the final prediction results. Li et al (2021) proposed GAEMDA to identify potential miRNA–disease associations in an end-to-end manner. In multilayer perception machine learning of diverse dimensions of semantic information, the introduction of a graph neural network serves to aggregate the neighborhood information of nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%