2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A graph database for feature characterization of dislocation networks

Balduin Katzer,
Daniel Betsche,
Klemens Böhm
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume that the experimental stress-strain data, which is conducted at a lower strain rate compared to CDD simulation, incorporate information about the stability of the network dislocation density, which is determined by the inverse surrogate model through the magnitude of the reaction constants. However, further analysis on the derivation of physical-based constitutive laws for dislocation network stability and evolution from DDD simulations is required for a better understanding of these network processes [59][60][61]. Summarizing, the prediction of simulation input parameters based on quite limited consideration of strain states still exhibits meaningful results and enables the derivation of input parameter sets for CDD simulations representing the experimental mechanical behavior and the microstructural evolution beyond the strain states, the inverse surrogate model is trained on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that the experimental stress-strain data, which is conducted at a lower strain rate compared to CDD simulation, incorporate information about the stability of the network dislocation density, which is determined by the inverse surrogate model through the magnitude of the reaction constants. However, further analysis on the derivation of physical-based constitutive laws for dislocation network stability and evolution from DDD simulations is required for a better understanding of these network processes [59][60][61]. Summarizing, the prediction of simulation input parameters based on quite limited consideration of strain states still exhibits meaningful results and enables the derivation of input parameter sets for CDD simulations representing the experimental mechanical behavior and the microstructural evolution beyond the strain states, the inverse surrogate model is trained on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%