A graphical analysis of the systematic error of classical binned methods in constructing luminosity functions

Abstract

The classical 1/V a and P C methods of constructing binned luminosity functions (LFs) are revisited and compared by graphical analysis. Using both theoretical analysis and illustration with an example, we show why the two methods give different results for the bins which are crossed by the flux limit curves L = L lim (z). Based on a combined sample simulated by a Monte Carlo method, the estimate φ of two methods are compared with the input model LFs. The two methods give identical and ideal estimate for the high luminosity points of each redshift interval. However, for the low luminosity bins of all the redshift intervals both methods give smaller estimate than the input model. We conclude that once the LF is evolving with redshift, the classical binned methods will unlikely give an ideal estimate over the total luminosity range. Page & Carrera (2000) noticed that for objects close to the flux limit φ 1/Va nearly always to be too small. We believe this is due to the arbitrary choosing of redshift and luminosity intervals. Because φ 1/Va is more sensitive to how the binning are chosen than φ P C . We suggest a new binning method, which can improve the LFs produced by the 1/V a method significantly, and also improve the LFs produced by the P C methods. Our simulations show that after adopting this new binning, both the 1/V a and P C methods have comparable results.

A Mixture Evolution Scenario of the AGN Radio Luminosity Function. II. Do Low- and High-power Radio-loud AGNs Evolve Differently?

“…It can be statistical error caused by inappropriately dividing redshift bins. As discussed by Yuan & Wang (2013), the estimated result of the binning method relies on how to chose the start point and width of each bin.…”

A Flexible Method for Estimating Luminosity Functions via Kernel Density Estimation

“…Yuan & Wang (2013) argued that this may lead to significant bias for the LF estimates close to the flux limit (see panel a of Figure 4). In this work we use the simple rule of thumb suggested by Yuan & Wang (2013) to divide bins. In the panel b of Figure 4, we illustrate this scheme for dividing bins.…”

“…This makes it impossible for the 1/V max method to be a mathematically rigorous density estimator. The 1/V max estimator can not accurately calculate the surveyed regions for objects close to the flux limit of their parent sample and thus produces a significant systematic error (see Page & Carrera 2000;Yuan & Wang 2013). To improve the 1/V max estimator, Page & Carrera (2000) proposed a new method that rests on a stronger mathematical foundation.…”

A Left and Right Truncated Schechter Luminosity Function for Quasars

“…Notably, Ref. [36] argued that both the and the binned approximation can produce bias at the faint end of the LF due to the arbitrary choosing of redshift and luminosity intervals.…”