2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A gravity-driven split Hopkinson tension bar for investigating quasi-ductile and strain-hardening cement-based composites under tensile impact loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of the matrix M1 and SHCC M1-6PE, the values obtained were slightly higher than the quasi-static ones. A similar trend was observed in [ 21 ], where comparable materials were tested using a tensile stress wave in a split-Hopkinson tension bar.…”
Section: Results Of the Compression Testssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In case of the matrix M1 and SHCC M1-6PE, the values obtained were slightly higher than the quasi-static ones. A similar trend was observed in [ 21 ], where comparable materials were tested using a tensile stress wave in a split-Hopkinson tension bar.…”
Section: Results Of the Compression Testssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Properties of the HDPE fibers are presented in Table 2 . Since the plain matrix was named M1 in the previous investigations [ 20 , 21 ], the same name is used in this study. The SHCC mixtures made of 6 and 12 mm PE fibers are denoted as M1-6PE and M1-12PE, respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cylindrical concrete specimens are tested in a gravity-driven split-Hopkinson tension bar to investigate performance of the material at high strain rates (Heravi et al, 2019), see Fig. 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finely grained matrix is used as the constituent matrix of strain hardening cement-based composites (SHCC), and its behavior under impact tensile loading has been investigated previously. Since the matrix was named M1 in the previous investigations [ 26 , 27 ], the same name is used in this study.…”
Section: Experimental Programmentioning
confidence: 99%