“…Accurate modeling of these redox processes, in particular electron transfer (ET) reactions at interfaces and polaron motion in solids, is a difficult electronic structure problem because their behavior is heavily dependent on the properties of the strongly correlated materials containing localized d electrons coupled with long-range processes such as hydration, disorder of the surface/solution interface, interaction of the solution phase with the highly charged mineral surface, and so forth. In the last few decades, considerable progress has been made in the development and use of large-scale electronic structure methods based on density functional theory (DFT) that can produce realistic models of these materials. − The development of ET theories has an even longer history, , from early developments of semiclassical Landau–Zener theory − and Marcus theory − to the application of standard approaches based on multiconfigurational self-consistent field and valence bond theories, − Mulliken-Hush formalism, , and more recent Greens function approaches. − Ideally, one would like to model ET in metal oxides and their surfaces by using periodic cells and large system sizes while at the same time using electronic structure methods beyond DFT for estimating the ET rates. However, because of the computational cost of such simulations combined with the lack of available computational chemistry software for calculating large periodic systems beyond DFT, it is common today to carry out simulations in two steps in which the geometries and reorganization energies of the ET reactions are first determined using large DFT calculations and then subsequently calculating the ET couplings between the initial and final states with local orbital methods on small clusters carved out from the larger DFT calculations. − …”