IntroductionSeismic provisions in current building codes and standards include rules for design of structures using nonlinear response history analysis in some conditions. Due to the lack of recorded data for the design level earthquakes (which are usually rare events), it is critical to develop systematic methods and useful tools to select and modify from current ground motion databases to provide a group of earthquake motions that can realistically represent important aspects of the design motion controlling the nonlinear response of civil engineering facilities [1]. The best method for selecting and scaling ground motions will depend on the type of assessment being performed. ATC-58-1 identifies three types of performance assessment: intensity, scenario, and time-based. Intensity-based assessments are the most common of the three types and compute the response of a building and its components for a specified intensity of ground shaking (this approach is the focus of this paper). A scenario-based assessment computes the response of a building to a user specified earthquake event, which is typically defined by earthquake magnitude and the distance between the earthquake source and the building site. A risk-based (referred to as time-based assessment in ATC-58-1) assessment provides information on response over a period of time (e.g., annual rates). This is the most comprehensive type of assessment and involves a number of intensity-based assessments over the range of ground motion levels of interest [2]. Despite the scenario-based assessment which computes the response of a building based on a specific earthquake event, intensity and time-based assessments have been conducted subjecting to a group of records. Time-based assessment acquires information of all occurred earthquakes which have been utilized to adjust hazard curve of the assessed region; so, as much as records could be provided, the confidence level will promote, so many researchers attempts to enlarge records category to reduce record-by-record variations incorporated in this type of assessment. However, intensity-based assessment deal with number of records represented by intensity measures (IM), like peak ground acceleration, spectral acceleration on fundamental period of the model or etc., which are scaled associated to the intensity assumed target spectrum. Therefore, although enlarge-