2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A ground motion selection and modification method capturing response spectrum characteristics and variability of scenario earthquakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
67
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, some scholars have shown that a well-selected ground-motion suite should match not only the target mean, but also the variation of the target spectrum (Jayaram et al, 2011;Wang, 2011). In other words, a suite of ground motions should be selected in performance-based earthquake engineering; the resulting ground-motion suite should properly capture the statistical distribution of ground motions under the given earthquake scenario, which is commonly specified by means, standard deviations, and inherent correlations (e.g., Baker and Jayaram, 2008;Wang and Du, 2012) of a target spectrum.…”
Section: Huang Et Al: Selecting Ground-motion Time Histories Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, some scholars have shown that a well-selected ground-motion suite should match not only the target mean, but also the variation of the target spectrum (Jayaram et al, 2011;Wang, 2011). In other words, a suite of ground motions should be selected in performance-based earthquake engineering; the resulting ground-motion suite should properly capture the statistical distribution of ground motions under the given earthquake scenario, which is commonly specified by means, standard deviations, and inherent correlations (e.g., Baker and Jayaram, 2008;Wang and Du, 2012) of a target spectrum.…”
Section: Huang Et Al: Selecting Ground-motion Time Histories Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, a suite of ground motions should be selected in performance-based earthquake engineering; the resulting ground-motion suite should properly capture the statistical distribution of ground motions under the given earthquake scenario, which is commonly specified by means, standard deviations, and inherent correlations (e.g., Baker and Jayaram, 2008;Wang and Du, 2012) of a target spectrum. There are several ground-motion selection algorithms available in the literature (Baker, 2010;Jayaram et al, 2011;Wang, 2011). One of the recently proposed interactive tools is the Design Ground Motion Library (DGML), which allows for selecting a suite of modified ground motions (multiple by scale factors) on the basis of response spectral shape and the characteristics of the recordings such as magnitude, distances, faulting types, and site conditions .…”
Section: Huang Et Al: Selecting Ground-motion Time Histories Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of capturing the variability in seismic analysis is reflected in the recent ATC-58-1 guideline [6], which recommended randomly gathering eleven ground motions from the chosen magnitude and distance bin and then scaling them to match the targeted spectrum value at the fundamental period of the structure. However, the randomness nature in the selection procedure makes it difficult to represent the true variability of ground motions [1].…”
Section: Ground Motion Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the spectral shape, the ground-motion characteristics important to the seismic response of the facility may also include the significant duration, number of strong shaking cycles, near-field directivity effects and pulse sequencing etc. It is necessary to specify the ranges of parameters over which searches are to be conducted and other limits and restrictions on the searches [1].…”
Section: Ground Motion Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation