1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1994.tb00973.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Ground Radar Survey of Medieval Kiln Sites in Suzu City, Western Japan*

Abstract: A ground‐penetrating radar study of medieval kiln sites located near Suzu city, on the Noto peninsula, was conducted prior to excavation. Archaeological site plans estimated from time slices of the closely‐spaced parallel radar profiles are compared with excavations and a proton magnetometer survey. The results indicate that non‐destructive remote sensing with radar can help to determine effectively the presence and general structural features of intact kiln floors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously published archaeological applications of GPR have tended to use antenna centre frequencies of 300 MHz or greater (Goodman et al, 1994;Beck & Weinstein-Evron, 1997;Conyers & Cameron, 1998;Toghe et al, 1998;Dobbs et al, 1999). These radar frequencies provide excellent resolution, but they limit the subsurface depth penetration of the GPR to less than 5 m. On open archaeological sites this depth of penetration is often sufficient to reach the base of any archaeological deposits, and Beck & Weinstein-Evron (1997) have used a 500 MHz GPR inside a cave to detect interfaces between unconsolidated sediments and limestone bedrock at a depth of 2 to 3 m below the surface of the sediment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously published archaeological applications of GPR have tended to use antenna centre frequencies of 300 MHz or greater (Goodman et al, 1994;Beck & Weinstein-Evron, 1997;Conyers & Cameron, 1998;Toghe et al, 1998;Dobbs et al, 1999). These radar frequencies provide excellent resolution, but they limit the subsurface depth penetration of the GPR to less than 5 m. On open archaeological sites this depth of penetration is often sufficient to reach the base of any archaeological deposits, and Beck & Weinstein-Evron (1997) have used a 500 MHz GPR inside a cave to detect interfaces between unconsolidated sediments and limestone bedrock at a depth of 2 to 3 m below the surface of the sediment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large digital databases from many transects could be processed simultaneously within a grid, creating three-dimensional maps of sites (Goodman and Nishimura 1993;Goodman et aL 1994;Goodman 1996;Goodman, Nishimura, and Rogers 1995;Conyers and Goodman 1997: 149-194).…”
Section: Ground Penetrating Radar Use In Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time slice analysis of GPR data has been accelerated by the requirements for making useful data presentations for archaeologists. Several recent papers (Milligan and Atkin, 1992;Goodman and Nishmura, 1993;Goodman et al, 1994a) have presented the re- sites, and some recent conference papers (e.g. Nishimura and Kamei, 1990;Annan et al, 1992;Olhoeft, 1994;Pertinnelli et al, 1994) indicate that radar time slicing and three-dimensional image rendering of GPR data sets are beginning to be practiced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%