1982
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A growth curve approach to the measurement of change.

Abstract: The measurement of individual change is approached from the standpoint of individual time paths and statistical models for individual change. Other distinctive features of this paper are (a) the consideration of both statistical and psychometric properties of measures of individual change and (b) the examination of measures of change for data with more than two observations on each individual. Many results and conclusions are at odds with the previous literature in the behavioral sciences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
783
1
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 975 publications
(792 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
7
783
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Psychologically speaking, such patterns of correlations can occur when the Time 1 and Time 2 measures of conflict reflect trajectory processes, whereby some couples are steadily increasing in conflict while others are reducing their conflict. The proper interpretation of such trajectory patterns has been discussed by Rogosa (1988;Rogosa, Brandt, & Zimowski, 1982). In a nutshell, when conflict at Time 2 is held constant at its mean value, then persons with unusually low Time 1 conflict will tend to have a trajectory of increasing conflict, whereas persons with unusually high Time 1 conflict will tend to have a trajectory of decreasing conflict.…”
Section: Suppressor Variable Processesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Psychologically speaking, such patterns of correlations can occur when the Time 1 and Time 2 measures of conflict reflect trajectory processes, whereby some couples are steadily increasing in conflict while others are reducing their conflict. The proper interpretation of such trajectory patterns has been discussed by Rogosa (1988;Rogosa, Brandt, & Zimowski, 1982). In a nutshell, when conflict at Time 2 is held constant at its mean value, then persons with unusually low Time 1 conflict will tend to have a trajectory of increasing conflict, whereas persons with unusually high Time 1 conflict will tend to have a trajectory of decreasing conflict.…”
Section: Suppressor Variable Processesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With respect to correlational analyses of the very old sample, we follow both practices and report both Posttest II performance and treatment gains. Two types of treatment gains were computed (e.g., Cronbach & Furby, 1970; but see also Rogosa, Brandt, & Zimowski, 1982): (a) simple difference scores between pretest and Posttest II and (b) residualized gain scores reflecting interindividual differences in change from pretest to Posttest II controlled for differences at pretest. Simple difference scores and residualized gain scores were highly correlated in the present sample of very old adults (r ϭ .99), and the pattern of results was identical for the two scores.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of temporal variation in repertoires are particularly relevant to research on learning, development and cultural elaboration. Techniques range from representing change in descriptive plots of trend lines to growth curve models that model the time trend in formal ways (Rogosa et al, 1982).…”
Section: Scaling and Representing Similarity In Cultural Toolkitsmentioning
confidence: 99%