2008
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.080372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians

Abstract: Survey research is an important form of scientific inquiry 1 that merits rigorous design and analysis. 2 The aim of a survey is to gather reliable and unbiased data from a representative sample of respondents.3 Increasingly, investigators administer questionnaires to clinicians about their knowledge, attitudes and practice 2,4,5 to generate or refine research questions and to evaluate the impact of clinical research on practice. Questionnaires can be descriptive (reporting factual data) or explanatory (drawing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

18
941
0
12

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,056 publications
(971 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
18
941
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…[41][42][43] It is also close to the mean response rate of 54% reported by a systematic review of physician postal surveys. 32,35 Our rigorous methodological approach, including key informant interviews, cognitive interviews, pilottesting, short and concise questionnaires with incentives to half of the physicians, and a special contact, optimized our response rate and yielded very few missing data.…”
Section: Respondentssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…[41][42][43] It is also close to the mean response rate of 54% reported by a systematic review of physician postal surveys. 32,35 Our rigorous methodological approach, including key informant interviews, cognitive interviews, pilottesting, short and concise questionnaires with incentives to half of the physicians, and a special contact, optimized our response rate and yielded very few missing data.…”
Section: Respondentssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…A group of seven anesthesiologists not involved in the development of the questionnaire completed the assessment using an adaptation of a structured instrument developed by Burns et al for this purpose. 21 As a result of this process, we made changes to the original instrument to improve clarity. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to distribution, the questionnaire was pilot tested for clarity and appropriateness by 10 emergency physicians and members of the Concussions Ontario: Diagnosis and Early Education working group (which included allied health and physician representatives) and revised as necessary. 34 All reviewers were excluded from the participant population.…”
Section: Instrument Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%