2010
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200900375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A guided tour of the Trans‐Proteomic Pipeline

Abstract: The Trans-Proteomic Pipeline (TPP) is a suite of software tools for the analysis of MS/MS data sets. The tools encompass most of the steps in a proteomic data analysis workflow in a single, integrated software system. Specifically, the TPP supports all steps from spectrometer output file conversion to protein-level statistical validation, including quantification by stable isotope ratios. We describe here the full workflow of the TPP and the tools therein, along with an example on a sample data set, demonstrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
630
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 739 publications
(638 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
630
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The OpenMS project is one of multiple software solutions addressing the computational challenges of mass spectrometry-based proteomics, each contributing in different areas such as protein inference, peptide database search or file conversion [6,7,23,24] . While some proprietary software packages offer solutions for specialized use cases, their closed nature makes their adaption to new requirements and integration into more complex workflows difficult.…”
Section: Community-driven Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The OpenMS project is one of multiple software solutions addressing the computational challenges of mass spectrometry-based proteomics, each contributing in different areas such as protein inference, peptide database search or file conversion [6,7,23,24] . While some proprietary software packages offer solutions for specialized use cases, their closed nature makes their adaption to new requirements and integration into more complex workflows difficult.…”
Section: Community-driven Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past efforts to mitigate these issues have led to the development of standardized data exchange formats [2,3,4,5] , which have recently been adopted by several software projects [6,7,8,9,10] . These standard formats enable the integration of tools from different sources, simplify the analysis of MS data from multiple vendors, and render published results more readily accessible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Libraries are shown to be much faster and capable of identifying low-quality spectra than sequence search engines, 2 as they search a smaller space (fewer candidates to choose from) and use real reference spectra with known ion intensities as opposed to simplistically predicted intensities in the sequence search engines. 29 The lowquality spectra of the early developmental stages (1 and 2 dpf) therefore might have been expected to perform so much better when searching against the library than against the sequence database ( Figure 4). For all developmental stages, larger numbers of spectra could be identified using SpectraST and the A library, than using SpectraST and the embryo-derived library or an X!Tandem sequence database search.…”
Section: Organ Differentiated Zebrafish Spectral Librarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistics for assessing identification data, whether evaluating individual peptidespectrum matches (32,42,50), stratifying confident identifications from likely errors across an LC-MS/MS file (40,51,52), or computing probabilities associated with proteins and isoforms (53)(54)(55), are key to discerning the value of these findings. Combining identifications from multiple search engines to more broadly interrogate the MS/MS data is commonly performed by software tools such as PEAKS inChorus (Bioinformatics Solutions Inc.), Phenyx (GeneBio), Proteome Software's Scaffold (56), and the Trans-Proteomic Pipeline's iProphet (57). A wide variety of tools adds more biological context to the list of identified proteins; a small sample of these include ProteinCenter (Thermo Fischer Scientific), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (58), PANTHER Classification System (59), Cytoscape (60), and WebGestalt (61).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%