2013
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/145/4/97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A H I Imaging Survey of Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars

Abstract: We present an imaging study of a sample of eight asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars in the H i 21-cm line. Using observations from the Very Large Array, we have unambiguously detected H i emission associated with the extended circumstellar envelopes of six of the targets. The detected H i masses range from M HI ≈ 0.015 − 0.055M ⊙ . The H i morphologies and kinematics are diverse, but in all cases appear to be significantly influenced by the interaction between the circumstellar envelope and the surrounding me… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12. RS Cnc also contrasts with the other stars known to have trailing H i wakes in that its space velocity is much lower, ∼15 km s −1 compared with V space > ∼ 57 km s −1 (see Matthews et al 2013). While no velocity gradient is seen along the tail of RS Cnc, the morphology of the tail gas reveals evidence of the importance of hydrodynamical effects.…”
Section: Kinematics Of the H I Emissionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…12. RS Cnc also contrasts with the other stars known to have trailing H i wakes in that its space velocity is much lower, ∼15 km s −1 compared with V space > ∼ 57 km s −1 (see Matthews et al 2013). While no velocity gradient is seen along the tail of RS Cnc, the morphology of the tail gas reveals evidence of the importance of hydrodynamical effects.…”
Section: Kinematics Of the H I Emissionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These are difficult observations to perform because of the omnipresence of this emission. Thanks to some dedicated work, however, considerable progress has been made in this area (Le Bertre and Gérard 2004;Matthews et al 2013Matthews et al , 2015. In general, the data do not contradict a largely isotropic mass loss, although there is evidence of circumstellar-interstellar media interactions at large distances from the stars.…”
Section: Circumstellar Morphologymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…3.1.3, but there are also interesting significant deviations from overall spherical symmetry. For instance, there is morphological evidence of the star (and the CSE) moving through the ISM in terms of bow shocks (Cox et al 2012a;Matthews et al 2013;Sahai and Mack-Crane 2014), Fig. 20, left panel.…”
Section: Morphology Of Cses: From the Wind Acceleration Region To Glomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now well established that detectable circumstellar envelopes of atomic hydrogen, spanning up to a parsec or more in size, form around certain types of evolved, mass-losing stars, and furthermore that the properties of these envelopes are significantly impacted by the space motion of the stars and the interaction of the stellar ejecta with the ISM (e.g., Gérard & Le Bertre 2006;Le Bertre et al 2012;Matthews et al 2013). For stars with low space velocities, quasi-spherical shells may be observed, while in cases where the space velocity is sufficiently high, bow shocks may be detectable in IR and ultraviolet wavelengths, and the effects of ram pressure may sweep back a portion of the ejecta to form a trailing gaseous wake (see M12; Matthews et al 2013 and references therein).…”
Section: Implications Of the Shell Morphology And Kinematics On Its Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For stars with low space velocities, quasi-spherical shells may be observed, while in cases where the space velocity is sufficiently high, bow shocks may be detectable in IR and ultraviolet wavelengths, and the effects of ram pressure may sweep back a portion of the ejecta to form a trailing gaseous wake (see M12; Matthews et al 2013 and references therein). Numerical models also predict that the properties of the shells will change significantly as stars evolve and undergo changes in their massloss rates, and as the ejecta expand into the ISM (e.g., Wareing et al 2007;Villaver et al 2012).…”
Section: Implications Of the Shell Morphology And Kinematics On Its Pmentioning
confidence: 99%