2013
DOI: 10.1255/jnirs.1048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Haemodynamic Brain–Computer Interface Based on Real-Time Classification of near Infrared Spectroscopy Signals during Motor Imagery and Mental Arithmetic

Abstract: A brain-computer interface (BCI) provides a direct communication channel between the brain and a computer, in order to enable the control of a technical device without any muscular activation. 1,2 For this purpose, the BCI system translates brain signals in real-time into control signals for various technical applications. For people with severe impairments of neuronal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
40
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, features from fNIRS were classified with 84.15 ± 6.8, 82.4% ± 6.3 and 86% ± 7.2 accuracy, sensitivity and specificity respectively. These fNIRS results outperformed previous studies [47,[88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98]. It however needs to be cautious as the data sets were different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…In contrast, features from fNIRS were classified with 84.15 ± 6.8, 82.4% ± 6.3 and 86% ± 7.2 accuracy, sensitivity and specificity respectively. These fNIRS results outperformed previous studies [47,[88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98]. It however needs to be cautious as the data sets were different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Online classification is a critical step toward realworld BCI applications and presents various challenges not applicable to offline classification, including hardware and software adaptations to allow for immediate classification, and to address classifier generalization issues. 29 The online accuracies achieved in this study are on par with those reached by Schudlo et al, 29 and Coyle et al, 3 and exceed the accuracies of other online NIRS-BCI studies, such as those by Chan et al 82 and Stangl et al 83 Our training paradigm was similar to that of previous online NIRS-BCIs (i.e., used in Ref. 29) but with fewer samples for classifier training and a shorter task performance interval of 17 s compared to 20 s used by Schudlo et al 29 This shorter response interval can improve the communication rate and decrease the mental demand placed on BCI users.…”
Section: Online and Offline Classificationcontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…This imaging modality has been used to detect the performance of a variety of controlled mental tasks including motor imagery tasks [2][3][4] and higherorder cognitive tasks [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] using measurements from the motor and prefrontal cortices, respectively. Individuals with congenital or long-term motor impairments may find it difficult or impossible to elicit a significant response in the motor cortex [15][16][17].…”
Section: Cortical Regions Considered In Nirs-bci Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, cognitive tasks that are not motor-based may be more suitable for a larger variety of potential BCI users and will be the focus of this work. These types of tasks previously considered for NIRS-BCI control have included mental arithmetic [4,5,7,8,[10][11][12]14], mental singing [6][7][8]14], word generation [9,12], mental rotation [12,14], and the n-back task [13].…”
Section: Cortical Regions Considered In Nirs-bci Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation