1971
DOI: 10.1099/00222615-4-1-139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Haemolytic V-Dependent Co2-Preferring Haemophilus Species (HaemophilUs Paraphro-Haemolyticus Nov. Spec.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional tests were performed according to the techniques described by Zinnemann et al (1968Zinnemann et al ( , 1971 for characterisation of the species described by these authors. The Haemophilus strains were assigned to species according to the taxonomy proposed by Zinnemann and Biberstein (1974).…”
Section: Methods Of Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional tests were performed according to the techniques described by Zinnemann et al (1968Zinnemann et al ( , 1971 for characterisation of the species described by these authors. The Haemophilus strains were assigned to species according to the taxonomy proposed by Zinnemann and Biberstein (1974).…”
Section: Methods Of Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of the strains was based on morphology, requirement for growth factors (using BBL disks containing either or both of the two X and V growth factors), and haemolytic activity examined after growth on 5 % defibrinated horse blood in Heart Infusion Agar (Difco) supplemented with 5 % Fildes enrichment (Difco). Additional tests were performed according to the techniques described by Zinnemann et al (1968Zinnemann et al ( , 1971 for characterisation of the species described by these authors. The Haemophilus strains were assigned to species according to the taxonomy proposed by Zinnemann and Biberstein (1974).…”
Section: Organismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…paraphrohaemolyticus was originally described as a species distinct from H. parahaemolyticus due to its CO 2 -stimulated growth (102), but this phenotypic trait is unreliable; indeed, one of the three original strains deposited by Zinnemann and coworkers was later shown to belong to H. parainfluenzae (99). Instead, H. parahaemolyticus has been separated from H. paraphrohaemolyticus by the former's ability to produce IgA1 protease and the latter's ability to produce ␤-galactosidase (48).…”
Section: The Haemophilus Parainfluenzae Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rare occurrence of this species in clinical samples is underscored by the mistaken identity of strain NCTC 10672 (=ATCC 29239), one of the original 3 strains (strain Corinthian) deposited as H. paraphrohaemolyticus by Zinnemann et al (1971). According to the present study, strain NCTC 10672 belongs to H. parainfluenzae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…She found the species to be frequently associated with acute pharyngitis and occasionally with subacute endocarditis (Pittman, 1953). H. paraphrohaemolyticus was later described as a species distinct from H. parahaemolyticus due to its CO 2 -stimulated growth (Zinnemann et al, 1971). Kilian (1976) was unable to validate H. parahaemolyticus as a separate species by extended phenotypic testing, because only the presence of haemolysis discriminated this species from H. parainfluenzae biotype III, and haemolysis is a variable trait of H. parainfluenzae (Kilian, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%