2018
DOI: 10.4064/sm8764-9-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Harnack inequality in Orlicz–Sobolev spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al., they study the setting when what we call F , f are zero, and using Orlicz spaces they address additional difficulties including including different upper and lower (almost)-homogeneities of the integrand, while proving similar bounds to what we recovered here when f, F are both constantly zero. In the isotropic setting, [AH18] shows a Harnack inequality similar to the 3.5. Meanwhile [Toi12] proves a general Harnack inequality, while assuming that the terms like F , f are in L ∞ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…al., they study the setting when what we call F , f are zero, and using Orlicz spaces they address additional difficulties including including different upper and lower (almost)-homogeneities of the integrand, while proving similar bounds to what we recovered here when f, F are both constantly zero. In the isotropic setting, [AH18] shows a Harnack inequality similar to the 3.5. Meanwhile [Toi12] proves a general Harnack inequality, while assuming that the terms like F , f are in L ∞ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In this short note we present a parametric version of the estimates obtained in [2]. In this sense, the bounds obtained here are optimal.…”
Section: (L)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…If additional, mild restrictions are imposed on g, we prove that solutions of this equation are regular, positive and vanish at infinity through an instrumental result (Theorem 3.1). The latter (which is consequence of an extended Harnack's inequality proved in [2]) states that the oscillation of the solutions is locally bounded by the supremum of the function on a ball. We stress the fact that φ need not be differentiable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Choose any real nonnegative number L such that b ≤ φ(L). The following average estimate is proved in [2] for any p > 0 :…”
Section: The Property (P)mentioning
confidence: 99%