Computational Systems Bioinformatics 2008
DOI: 10.1142/9781848162648_0015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hausdorff-Based Noe Assignment Algorithm Using Protein Backbone Determined From Residual Dipolar Couplings and Rotamer Patterns

Abstract: High-throughput structure determination based on solution Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy plays an important role in structural genomics. One of the main bottlenecks in NMR structure determination is the interpretation of NMR data to obtain a sufficient number of accurate distance restraints by assigning nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) spectral peaks to pairs of protons. The difficulty in automated NOE assignment mainly lies in the ambiguities arising both from the resonance degeneracy of chemica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This review is tempered by our recent experiences in automated assignments [79, 82, 83, 118, 153, 174], novel algorithms for protein structure determination [152, 156, 117, 89, 110, 151, 155, 154], characterization of protein complexes [118, 99] and membrane proteins [117], and fold recognition using only unassigned NMR data [82, 83, 78, 80]. Recent algorithms for automated assignment and structure determination based on sparse dipolar couplings represent a departure from the stochastic methods frequently employed by the NMR community (e.g., simulated annealing/molecular dynamics (SA/MD), Monte Carlo (MC), etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This review is tempered by our recent experiences in automated assignments [79, 82, 83, 118, 153, 174], novel algorithms for protein structure determination [152, 156, 117, 89, 110, 151, 155, 154], characterization of protein complexes [118, 99] and membrane proteins [117], and fold recognition using only unassigned NMR data [82, 83, 78, 80]. Recent algorithms for automated assignment and structure determination based on sparse dipolar couplings represent a departure from the stochastic methods frequently employed by the NMR community (e.g., simulated annealing/molecular dynamics (SA/MD), Monte Carlo (MC), etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novel techniques, including the algorithms triangle [153] and H ana [174], exploit the accurate, high-throughput backbone structures obtained exactly using sparse RDCs. NOE assignment can be difficult to fully automate, and structure determination of symmetric membrane proteins by NMR can be challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulated peak list for each model is then compared with the experimental peak list using the COMPASS score, which is based on the modified Hausdorff distance. Hausdorff distances are a popular family of metrics in computational image analysis, and have found applications both in structure comparison and NOESY (nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy) peak matching (Zeng et al, 2008; Kozin and Svergun, 2001). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We extracted the NH- and CH-bond vector coordinates for ubiquitin from the corresponding PDB files listed in Table 3, for hSRI from pdb ID 2A7O, for ff2 from pdb ID 2E71, for pol η from pdb ID 2I5O and for GB1 from pdb ID 3GB1. We extracted the backbone NOEs (NOEs between H α and amide protons) for hSRI, ff2, ubiquitin, pol η and GB1 from the list of assigned NOEs by HANA [17]. This amounts to 156, 105, 155, 78 and 138 NOEs, respectively.…”
Section: Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%