2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A head-to-head comparison of the degradation rate of resorbable bioceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few in vitro studies continue degradation testing beyond 28 days [ 12 , 18 , 19 ]. However, bone defects typically take much longer to heal so the degradation behavior should be monitored over a much longer time period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Few in vitro studies continue degradation testing beyond 28 days [ 12 , 18 , 19 ]. However, bone defects typically take much longer to heal so the degradation behavior should be monitored over a much longer time period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degradation of calcium sulfate hemihydrate discs may be even more unpredictable. Hsu et al applied a sintering technique to remove the pores and crystal water from the calcium sulfate hemihydrate structure, resulting in a significant reduction in the material’s degradation rate [ 12 ]. As demonstrated in the present study, the sintered CaSO 4 specimen degraded 23% after 28 days, then another 25% from weeks 5 to 12 (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the amount of releasing Sr depended on the material of the carrier, depended also on the type of aqueous solution. Since the degradation rate of calcium phosphate and bioglass was usually slow [13], the amount of Sr could be released from these calcium salts was therefore low (Table 1). Furthermore, a design rule for Sr-containing carrier is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calcium sulfate has been used as bone void filler for over 100 years. An in vitro test over a time span of 28 days demonstrated a steady degradation rate [13,14]. Complete degradation may take up to 3 months, which is about the time needed for the recovery of a bone defect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%