A Healing Journey with Chronic Pain: A Meta-Ethnography Synthesizing 195 Qualitative Studies

Abstract

Objective There is a large body of research exploring what it means for a person to live with chronic pain. However, existing research does not help us understand what it means to recover. We aimed to identify qualitative research that explored the experience of living with chronic pain published since 2012 and to understand the process of recovery. Design A synthesis of qualitative research using meta-ethnography. Methods We used the seven stages of meta-ethnography. We systematically searched for qualitative research, published since 2012, that explored adults’ experiences of living with, and being treated for, chronic pain. We used constant comparison to distill the essence of ideas into themes and developed a conceptual model. Results We screened 1,328 titles and included 195 studies. Our conceptual model indicates that validation and reconnection can empower a person with chronic pain to embark on a journey of healing. To embark on this journey requires commitment, energy, and support. Conclusions The innovation of our study is to conceptualize healing as an ongoing and iterating journey rather than a destination. Health interventions for chronic pain would usefully focus on validating pain through meaningful and acceptable explanations; validating patients by listening to and valuing their stories; encouraging patients to connect with a meaningful sense of self, to be kind to themselves, and to explore new possibilities for the future; and facilitating safe reconnection with the social world. This could make a real difference to people living with chronic pain who are on their own healing journeys.

Perceived working mechanisms of psychosomatic therapy in patients with persistent somatic symptoms in primary care: a qualitative study

“…A recent study on health interventions for chronic pain suggested that interventions should focus on validating pain through meaningful and rational explanations and validating patients by listening to and valuing their stories. 35 In our study, therapists as well as patients mentioned the importance of these issues. However, the most important elements in providing symptom explanation according to therapists in our study is the body awareness exercise through which patients experience the body–mind interaction themselves.…”

Should person-centredness care be an affordable goal in French osteopathic education?

“…Almost every research article assumes measurement invariance in self-reported measures even though patients could change their internal standards of measurement (recalibration), the way they value different domains assessed by a multidimensional questionnaire (reprioritization) or modify of the construction of the latent variables (reconceptualisation) [55,56]. These modifications may bias our understanding of patients, their symptoms and their point of view, especially when making sense of pain (or reconceptualise pain) is an important step in patients' healing journey in chronic pain [57]. One should consider or test (even if it is a difficult task) the invariance hypothesis when assessing evolution of PROM or PREM in research, clinical and educational contexts.…”

Massage Therapy: A Person-Centred Approach to Chronic Pain

“…(38,(47)(48)(49) Incorporating positive narratives that reassure and educate the patient are consistent with current best practices. (50) When used correctly, language is a tool to enable and encourage; when used incorrectly, language may contribute to the maintenance of their pain state. (51) The massage therapist must be careful to avoid language that is overly pathoanatomical and suggests damage and poor prognosis, such as musculoskeletal components being "out of alignment" or "weak".…”