1989
DOI: 10.1016/0040-1951(89)90130-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A heat generation model for continental crust based on deep drilling in the Baltic Shield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to investigations in other metamorphic regions [e.g., Kremenetsky et al, 1989: Ashwal et al, 1987, the heat production profile to 9.1 km depth at KTB vitiates any hope finding simple, general and systematic models for the vertical distribution of A(z) in the upper crystalline continental crust. Less is known about the middle and lower crust except the fact that, in general, A(z) has to decrease with depth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Similar to investigations in other metamorphic regions [e.g., Kremenetsky et al, 1989: Ashwal et al, 1987, the heat production profile to 9.1 km depth at KTB vitiates any hope finding simple, general and systematic models for the vertical distribution of A(z) in the upper crystalline continental crust. Less is known about the middle and lower crust except the fact that, in general, A(z) has to decrease with depth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Xenoliths lead to a global average heat production of 0.28 mW m À3 (Rudnick and Fountain, 1995), while exposed rocks from lower crustal levels yield 0.4-0.5 mW m À3 (Figure 14). At Kola, Baltic Shield, Russia, the Proterozoic supracrustal rocks (above 4 km) have much lower heat production (0.4 mW m À3 ) than the Archean basement (1.47 mW m À3 ) (Kremenentsky et al, 1989). Studies of exposed crustal sections suggest a general trend of decreasing heat production with depth, but this trend is not a monotonic function (Ashwal et al, 1987;Fountain et al, 1987;Ketcham, 1996).…”
Section: Crustal Heat Productionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Other models use an empirical correlation between seismic velocity and radiogenic heat production (Rybach and Buntebarth 1982). Direct measurements on exposed cross sections (Ashwal et al Fountain et al 1987) and in deep boreholes (Kremenetsky et al 1989) indicate the primary role of lithology and do not favour one of the aforementioned models. We have used a variation of the exponential model, where heat generation decreases exponentially in the upper -10 km of the crust and has relatively uniform values in the lower crust and upper mantle.…”
Section: Lmentioning
confidence: 98%